From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Haggerty Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Provide API to invalidate refs cache Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:43:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4E9C8557.50709@alum.mit.edu> References: <1318819091-7066-1-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <20111017184708.GB2540@sandbox-rc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Drew Northup , Jakub Narebski , Johan Herland , Julian Phillips To: Heiko Voigt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 17 21:43:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFt6C-00086S-3v for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:43:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753673Ab1JQTno (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:43:44 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:50736 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751764Ab1JQTnn (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:43:43 -0400 X-Envelope-From: mhagger@alum.mit.edu Received: from [192.168.100.152] (ssh.berlin.jpk.com [212.222.128.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id p9HJhK5Z014797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:43:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15 In-Reply-To: <20111017184708.GB2540@sandbox-rc> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 10/17/2011 08:47 PM, Heiko Voigt wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 04:38:04AM +0200, mhagger@alum.mit.edu wrote: >> [1] http://marc.info/?l=git&m=131827641227965&w=2 >> In this mailing list thread, Heiko Voigt stated that git-submodule >> does not modify any references, so it should not have to use the >> API. > > This is not entirely true. I was saying that my submodule-merge code is > currently the only one using the refs api for submodules and that does > not need to modify submodule refs. I imagine that there will be some > users when submodule support matures (e.g. recursive push). Sorry for misunderstanding/misrepresenting you; thanks for the clarification. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/