git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	cmn@elego.de, A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
	Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/13] add_ref(): move the call of check_refname_format() to callers
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:59:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9F4837.5070108@alum.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vsjmobqim.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On 10/19/2011 11:49 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> mhagger@alum.mit.edu writes:
>> I'm still not clear on how extra_refs are used.  Are they generated
>> from local refs or are they generated from remote refs?  If the
>> latter, then it is probably irresponsible not to do *some* sanity
>> checking in add_extra_ref() to prevent any chance of refnames like
>> "../../../etc/passwd".
> 
> No, add_extra_ref() already tells us what their values are, these are
> never used to actually read from filesystem. Their refname field has
> almost no value other than for debugging and we probably shouldn't even
> insist on uniqueness among extra refs or for that matter collision with
> the real refs. [...]

Thanks for the explanation.  I'm inspired to separate them a little bit
more from "real" refs because they are such a special case.  For
example, maybe it would make sense to add a function
for_each_extra_ref() to avoid having to mix them with real refs in the
iteration.  OTOH not important AFAICS.

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-19 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-19 20:55 [RFC 00/13] Checking full vs. partial refnames mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 01/13] check_refname_component(): iterate via index rather than via pointer mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 02/13] parse_refname_prefix(): new function mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 03/13] Teach check_refname_format() to check full refnames mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 04/13] add_ref(): move the call of check_refname_format() to callers mhagger
2011-10-19 21:49   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-10-19 21:59     ` Michael Haggerty [this message]
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 05/13] receive-pack::update(): use check_refname_format(..., REFNAME_FULL) mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 06/13] strbuf_check_branch_ref(): " mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 07/13] one_local_ref(): " mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 08/13] expand_namespace(): the refname is full, so use REFNAME_FULL option mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 09/13] new_branch(): verify that new branch name is a valid full refname mhagger
2011-10-19 21:52   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 10/13] strbuf_check_tag_ref(): the refname is full, so use REFNAME_FULL option mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 11/13] replace_object(): " mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 12/13] resolve_ref: use check_refname_format(..., REFNAME_FULL) mhagger
2011-10-19 20:55 ` [RFC 13/13] filter_refs(): the refname is full, so use REFNAME_FULL option mhagger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E9F4837.5070108@alum.mit.edu \
    --to=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
    --cc=cmn@elego.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=gitzilla@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=srabbelier@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).