git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Is there a place for benchmarking scripts?
@ 2011-10-26  9:50 Michael Haggerty
  2011-10-27 16:01 ` René Scharfe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Haggerty @ 2011-10-26  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git

I've been doing a lot of benchmarking of git performance in the presence
of lots of references.  I've written a few scripts to automate the
benchmarking [1].  They are not beautiful and would require a couple of
local adjustments [2,3].  They are too time-consuming to be made part of
the usual test suite.  I wouldn't want to commit to maintaining them.
But they have certainly been useful to me, and they generate readable
output [4].

My question is: would such benchmarking scripts be welcome within the
git project?  If so, where should I put it?  Is any benchmarking
code/framework already in use?

Michael

[1] Branch "refperf" at git://github.com/mhagger/git.git

[2] For example, one script checks out specified git revisions, merges
in the "refperf" branch to get the benchmarking code, then runs tests.
This script has to be adjusted with the local name of the "refperf"
branch (e.g., "refperf" vs. "origin/refperf" vs. ...)

[3] I wanted the tests to include cases with a cold disk cache and with
a warm disk cache.  For the former, I have the script run "sync; sudo sh
-c 'echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'" which obviously only works on
Linux and only when the user has password-less sudo permissions.

[4] Example (numbers are times in seconds):

===================================  ========  ========  ========
Test name                                 [0]       [1]       [2]
===================================  ========  ========  ========
branch-loose-cold                        3.32      3.25      0.55
branch-loose-warm                        0.60      0.22      0.00
for-each-ref-loose-cold                  3.71      3.46      3.45
for-each-ref-loose-warm                  0.83      0.46      0.47
checkout-loose-cold                      3.82      3.23      0.63
checkout-loose-warm                      0.58      0.21      0.01
checkout-orphan-loose                    0.58      0.20      0.00
checkout-from-detached-loose-cold        4.54      4.20      3.75
checkout-from-detached-loose-warm        1.41      1.07      0.63
branch-contains-loose-cold               4.04      3.71      3.67
branch-contains-loose-warm               0.93      0.57      0.56
pack-refs-loose                          2.31      1.92      1.91
branch-packed-cold                       0.53      0.50      0.49
branch-packed-warm                       0.02      0.02      0.03
for-each-ref-packed-cold                 1.01      0.92      0.94
for-each-ref-packed-warm                 0.26      0.27      0.28
checkout-packed-cold                    14.37      1.51      1.27
checkout-packed-warm                     0.04      0.03      0.03
checkout-orphan-packed                   0.02      0.02      0.03
checkout-from-detached-packed-cold      14.54      1.51      1.12
checkout-from-detached-packed-warm      13.85      0.82      0.46
branch-contains-packed-cold              1.03      1.04      1.01
branch-contains-packed-warm              0.37      0.38      0.39
clone-loose-cold                        13.17     11.97     12.45
clone-loose-warm                         6.86      5.40      5.83
fetch-nothing-loose                      1.24      1.11      1.52
pack-refs                                0.27      0.27      0.29
fetch-nothing-packed                     1.23      1.11      1.52
clone-packed-cold                        1.89      1.84      1.80
clone-packed-warm                        0.62      0.63      0.70
fetch-everything-cold                   12.85     13.07     13.40
fetch-everything-warm                    6.53      6.92      6.88
filter-branch-warm                   35383.91  15869.38    748.01
===================================  ========  ========  ========


[0] 703f05a (tag: v1.7.7) Git 1.7.7
    Test repository created using: t/make-refperf-repo --commits 20000
--refs 10000 --shard
[1] 2c5c66b Merge branch 'jp/get-ref-dir-unsorted'
    Test repository created using: t/make-refperf-repo --commits 20000
--refs 10000 --shard
[2] f579019 (ref-api-D) sort_ref_dir(): remove the recurse argument
    Test repository created using: t/make-refperf-repo --commits 20000
--refs 10000 --shard


-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Is there a place for benchmarking scripts?
  2011-10-26  9:50 Is there a place for benchmarking scripts? Michael Haggerty
@ 2011-10-27 16:01 ` René Scharfe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: René Scharfe @ 2011-10-27 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Haggerty; +Cc: git

Am 26.10.2011 11:50, schrieb Michael Haggerty:
> I've been doing a lot of benchmarking of git performance in the presence
> of lots of references.  I've written a few scripts to automate the
> benchmarking [1].  They are not beautiful and would require a couple of
> local adjustments [2,3].  They are too time-consuming to be made part of
> the usual test suite.  I wouldn't want to commit to maintaining them.
> But they have certainly been useful to me, and they generate readable
> output [4].
> 
> My question is: would such benchmarking scripts be welcome within the
> git project?  If so, where should I put it?  Is any benchmarking
> code/framework already in use?

That would be nice.  A whole performance regression testing suite would
be even nicer and can perhaps be built piece by piece.

We have contrib/ and we have the test-* commands; t/ doesn't seem to fit
too well with its focus on OK or fail.

René

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-27 16:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-26  9:50 Is there a place for benchmarking scripts? Michael Haggerty
2011-10-27 16:01 ` René Scharfe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).