From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Scharfe?= Subject: Re: Is there a place for benchmarking scripts? Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:01:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4EA98064.3060706@lsrfire.ath.cx> References: <4EA7D7E3.2020009@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Haggerty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 27 18:02:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJSP1-0006ca-UG for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:02:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753132Ab1J0QBy convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:01:54 -0400 Received: from india601.server4you.de ([85.25.151.105]:60395 "EHLO india601.server4you.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752901Ab1J0QBy (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:01:54 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.104] (p4FFDAB8C.dip.t-dialin.net [79.253.171.140]) by india601.server4you.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F04B2F8034; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:01:52 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4EA7D7E3.2020009@alum.mit.edu> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 26.10.2011 11:50, schrieb Michael Haggerty: > I've been doing a lot of benchmarking of git performance in the prese= nce > of lots of references. I've written a few scripts to automate the > benchmarking [1]. They are not beautiful and would require a couple = of > local adjustments [2,3]. They are too time-consuming to be made part= of > the usual test suite. I wouldn't want to commit to maintaining them. > But they have certainly been useful to me, and they generate readable > output [4]. >=20 > My question is: would such benchmarking scripts be welcome within the > git project? If so, where should I put it? Is any benchmarking > code/framework already in use? That would be nice. A whole performance regression testing suite would be even nicer and can perhaps be built piece by piece. We have contrib/ and we have the test-* commands; t/ doesn't seem to fi= t too well with its focus on OK or fail. Ren=E9