From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramsay Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] git-credential-cache--daemon on Cygwin Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:18:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4EA99266.7030002@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> References: <4EA2FC0D.5060404@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> <20111022191509.GB1785@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: GIT Mailing-list To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 27 19:31:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJTni-00072s-W5 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:31:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753998Ab1J0Rb3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:31:29 -0400 Received: from anchor-post-1.mail.demon.net ([195.173.77.132]:55166 "EHLO anchor-post-1.mail.demon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753524Ab1J0Rb3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:31:29 -0400 Received: from ramsay1.demon.co.uk ([193.237.126.196]) by anchor-post-1.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1RJTnb-0007NC-hn; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:31:28 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) In-Reply-To: <20111022191509.GB1785@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 06:23:25PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: > >> Assuming that a modified http-auth-keyring series will make a return to pu >> sometime, could you please squash these patches into (the patch corresponding to) >> commit 2d6874d (credentials: add "cache" helper, 18-07-2011). Thanks! > > I'm planning a reroll, so I'll squash them (or something similar) in. Thanks! > It's definitely coming back, so if you feel like working on it, please > do. Also note that if it would be easier to have an alternate > abstraction for inter-process communication on windows, I'm open to > doing that in the cache daemon. My initial reaction was to use a "named pipe" (aka fifo), but on reflection, I don't think it would be any easier; the unix socket emulation should not be too difficult (famous last words!). :-D ATB, Ramsay Jones