From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [msysGit] Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2011, #11; Fri, 28) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:43:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4EADC4F2.9040008@kdbg.org> References: <7vzkglrnmc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, msysGit To: kusmabite@gmail.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 30 22:43:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKdAR-000077-9M for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:43:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752750Ab1J3Vng (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:43:36 -0400 Received: from bsmtp5.bon.at ([195.3.86.187]:10483 "EHLO lbmfmo03.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752276Ab1J3Vnf (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:43:35 -0400 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at (unknown [10.232.130.106]) by lbmfmo03.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB6ACDF86 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:43:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87D910013; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:42:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FAC19F4AA; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:43:14 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 SUSE/3.1.15 Thunderbird/3.1.15 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 29.10.2011 17:42, schrieb Erik Faye-Lund: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * ef/mingw-upload-archive (2011-10-26) 3 commits >> - upload-archive: use start_command instead of fork >> - compat/win32/poll.c: upgrade from upstream >> - mingw: move poll out of sys-folder >> >> Are msysgit folks OK with this series (I didn't see msysgit list Cc'ed on >> these patches)? If so let's move this forward, as the changes to the core >> part seem solid. > > The msysgit list not being Cc'ed on the patches was a slip-up on my > behalf. I believe the changes are relatively uncontroversial from an > msysgit point of view, though. However, an ack/nack would be > appreciated ;) The patch series looks good and passes my tests. Therefore: Acked-by: Johannes Sixt -- Hannes