From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael J Gruber Subject: Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes) Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:05:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4EB1B099.5030701@drmicha.warpmail.net> References: <20111026202235.GA20928@havoc.gtf.org> <1319969101.5215.20.camel@dabdike> <1320049150.8283.19.camel@dabdike> <7vy5w1ow90.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vwrbjlj5r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4EB12122.7010803@drmicha.warpmail.net> <7v1utqjqre.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 02 22:05:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLi0B-0001f4-Jr for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:05:40 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752716Ab1KBVFh (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:05:37 -0400 Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:44410 "EHLO out5.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751079Ab1KBVFe (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:05:34 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4247D20E42; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:05:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:05:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=KH+MEN04zxEZRBNzNi2Y/r eLNI4=; b=MoDZDUgojWVUak2Jm7fb6uBP4FkqIiaX3f32K+PQXkVx9qnQFBBtfW CDSuUHaw1cjnkCSbZJ86zsougNPzaZDqYwVBYdm2Q6OU9xCDK/4O9d7PXlQSRqB6 9fnF86TeclcWFvbF0Z0xh6jJEnySClkAl2Lxm9bgJnrOikLSYDt8Q= X-Sasl-enc: Wf/nvYwNfRCqWgdKGwxTw94ntljN1FhoNnhninJ9Lp2K 1320267932 Received: from localhost.localdomain (p4FC752B6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.82.182]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74AA5483403; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:05:31 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 In-Reply-To: <7v1utqjqre.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2011 19:58: > Michael J Gruber writes: > >> The advantage of tags is that they can be added without rewriting the >> commit, of course. > > And you did neither think about the downsides of tags, nor read what > others already explained for you? We're just weighing things differently here, and no accusations of "misinformation" or "not thinking" will change this.