Re: Auto update submodules after merge and reset

[Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>]

Am 30.11.2011 01:55, schrieb Max Krasnyansky:
> Does anyone have a pointer to a thread/discussion that explains why git submodules are not auto
> updated when the superproject is updated (merge, reset, etc) by default?

This is because in current git a submodules work tree gets only updated
when running "git submodule update". A default auto update wouldn't be
backwards compatible (and some users really like it the way it is now).
I'm working on a patch series to teach Git to optionally update the
submodules work trees on checkout, reset merge and so on, but I'm not
there yet.

> Assuming a simple and default setup where submodule update policy is set to "checkout".
> It seems that the default and sane behavior should be to update (checkout) corresponding submodule
> commit to track the superproject.

I agree, but we should decide about a sane default when the feature is
there. In the first version it will be off by default, so people can make
up their minds about breaking backwards compatibility.

> I can't seem to find convincing explanation why it's not the case :). Having to manually update
> submodules after pull or reset has been error prone and confusing for the devs I work with.

Yes, we even had some mis-merges because of that.

> I'm thinking about adding a config option that would enable automatic submodule update but wanted
> to see if there is some fundamental reason why it would not be accepted.

I think adding something like an "submodule.autoupdate" config makes lots
of sense, but IMO it should affect all work tree updating porcelain commands,
not just merge.