From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
To: kusmabite@gmail.com
Cc: "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set hard limit on delta chain depth
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:54:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDE2C95.5040804@alum.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPQNSaE=TWGbBRMnthEuT181=XbOafPfgx88_JQnnQ6TiYyqw@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/06/2011 01:17 PM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> 2011/12/5 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>:
>> Too deep delta chains can cause stack overflow in get_base_data(). Set
>> a hard limit so that index-pack does not run out of stack. Also stop
>> people from producing such a long delta chains using "pack-object
>> --depth=<too large>"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> I used to make very long delta chains and triggered this in index-pack.
>> I did not care reporting because it's my fault anyway. Think again,
>> index-pack is called at server side and a malicious client can
>> trigger this. This patch does not improve the situation much, but at
>> least we won't get sigsegv at server side.
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to make the limit a config option rather
> than a hard-coded value of 128 (which seems arbitrary to me)? After
> all, different platforms have different stack-limitations...
I'm confused: is the data only ever read by the same host that generated
it? Because if not, then the "creator" had better never be configured
to use a chain depth that the "reader" cannot handle. This in turn
imply that there should be a common limit that is supported by all git
clients and is a documented part of the protocol. (Or the code has to
be rewritten to use an explicit stack instead of recursion.)
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-05 7:04 [PATCH] Set hard limit on delta chain depth Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-12-06 12:17 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-12-06 12:32 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-06 12:41 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-12-06 12:48 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-06 14:54 ` Michael Haggerty [this message]
2011-12-06 15:30 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-06 18:12 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-12-06 18:56 ` Jeff King
2011-12-06 15:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-06 15:45 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-10 0:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-07 17:50 ` [PATCH] index-pack: eliminate unlimited recursion in get_delta_base() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-12-08 3:02 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-12-08 11:06 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-08 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] index_pack: indent find_unresolved_detals one level pclouds
2011-12-09 21:27 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <1323351638-4790-1-git-send-email-y>
2011-12-08 13:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] index-pack: a naive attempt to flatten find_unresolved_deltas pclouds
2011-12-08 16:42 ` Shawn Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDE2C95.5040804@alum.mit.edu \
--to=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=kusmabite@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).