From: "René Scharfe" <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] userdiff: allow * between cpp funcname words
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:07:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDE83F7.6030708@lsrfire.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDE8086.9080303@kdbg.org>
Am 06.12.2011 21:52, schrieb Johannes Sixt:
> Am 06.12.2011 21:19, schrieb Jeff King:
>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:17:56PM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote:
>>
>>>> Looks reasonable to me. You can see the difference, for instance, with:
>>>>
>>>> git show -U1 3c73a1d
>>>>
>>>> (The -U1 is because of the annoying "we will start looking for the
>>>> header at the top of context, not the top of changes" behavior I
>>>> mentioned last week).
>>>
>>> Actually (sadly) I'll have to revise it. It doesn't match much of C++
>>> either, and I haven't yet come up with a reasonable regex that
>>> matches, say,
>>>
>>> foo::Bar<int>::t& Baz::operator<<(
>>>
>>> which I would call ludicrous, but it's valid C++.
>>
>> Ick, yeah. Maybe it is worth doing the "*" thing for now, and then
>> worrying about advanced C++ stuff on top as another patch. AFAICT, your
>> original patch is a strict improvement.
>
> Excuse me, where's the problem? The above example shows this
>
> @@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ char *url_decode(const char *url)
> struct strbuf out = STRBUF_INIT;
> - const char *slash = strchr(url, '/');
> + const char *colon = strchr(url, ':');
> ...
>
> with current 4cb5d10b. This looks quite correct, no?
That's with the default heuristic; try something like this first to turn
on userdiff:
$ echo url.c diff=cpp >>.gitattributes
René
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-06 16:35 [PATCH] userdiff: allow * between cpp funcname words Thomas Rast
2011-12-06 19:02 ` Jeff King
2011-12-06 20:17 ` Thomas Rast
2011-12-06 20:19 ` Jeff King
2011-12-06 20:52 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-12-06 21:07 ` René Scharfe [this message]
2011-12-06 21:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-07 8:04 ` Thomas Rast
2011-12-07 21:13 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDE83F7.6030708@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--to=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).