From: Pete Harlan <pgit@pcharlan.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug?] checkout -m doesn't work without a base version
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:30:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF1631.5090906@pcharlan.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vbormn8vk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 12/05/2011 10:58 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Pete Harlan <pgit@pcharlan.com> writes:
>
>> But this only works if there's a base version; if foo.c was added in
>> each branch, we get:
>>
>> error: path 'foo.c' does not have all three versions
>>
>> Git didn't need all three versions to create the original conflicted
>> file, so why would it need them to recreate it?
>
> Because the original "merge" was a bit more carefully written but
> "checkout -m" was written without worrying too much about "both sides
> added differently" corner case and still being defensive about not doing
> random thing upon getting an unexpected input state.
>
> IOW, being lazy ;-)
>
> How does this look?
Wow, thanks for the quick response! That does indeed let me checkout
the file as expected.
I wrote a test (below) to be folded in with your patch, but the test
fails because it expects the restored file to be the same as the
originally-conflicted file, but the conflict-line labels change from
"HEAD" and "master":
<<<<<<< HEAD
in_topic
=======
in_master
>>>>>>> master
to "ours" and "theirs". (The same thing happens in the 3-way merge
case.)
If the label change is expected then I can rewrite the test to ignore
labels, or to expect "ours" and "theirs", whichever you think is best.
If the label change is unexpected, then I guess the test is good :)
--Pete
-- >8 --
Test 'checkout -m -- path' when path is a 2-way merge
Signed-off-by: Pete Harlan <pgit@pcharlan.com>
---
t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh
diff --git a/t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh b/t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..5b50360
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t2023-checkout-m-twoway.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='checkout -m -- conflicted/path/with/2-way/merge
+
+Ensures that checkout -m on a resolved file restores the conflicted file
+when it conflicted with a 2-way merge.'
+
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+test_expect_success setup '
+ test_tick &&
+ test_commit initial_commit &&
+ git branch topic &&
+ test_commit added_in_master file.txt in_master &&
+ git checkout topic &&
+ test_commit added_in_topic file.txt in_topic
+'
+
+test_must_fail git merge master
+
+test_expect_success '-m restores 2-way conflicted+resolved file' '
+ cp file.txt file.txt.conflicted &&
+ echo resolved >file.txt &&
+ git add file.txt &&
+ git checkout -m -- file.txt &&
+ test_cmp file.txt.conflicted file.txt
+'
+
+test_done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-07 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-04 22:31 [bug?] checkout -m doesn't work without a base version Pete Harlan
2011-12-05 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-07 7:30 ` Pete Harlan [this message]
2011-12-08 18:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-12 1:48 ` Pete Harlan
2011-12-12 5:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-20 20:37 ` [PATCH] t/t2023-checkout-m.sh: fix use of test_must_fail Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2011-12-20 21:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-14 10:19 ` [bug?] checkout -m doesn't work without a base version Michael Schubert
2011-12-14 17:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-15 4:20 ` Miles Bader
2011-12-15 10:11 ` Michael Schubert
2011-12-15 10:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-15 17:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-16 22:38 ` Ramsay Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDF1631.5090906@pcharlan.com \
--to=pgit@pcharlan.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).