From: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
To: Michael Horowitz <michael.horowitz@ieee.org>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git-p4 using notes
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:55:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEBA24F.8030103@diamand.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLRbori1Dinc2epputWfjgCOWp7M2f=+TA0w2jHq_fmRC=y3w@mail.gmail.com>
On 16/12/11 16:07, Michael Horowitz wrote:
> For those of you using git-p4 because of a company requirement to use
> Perforce, but really wish you could use git only, the most frustrating
> part is the fact that when changes are submitted, the commit message
> is rewritten to include a reference to the P4 change number which is
> used by the sync. When syncing back changes, this causes the commit
> hash to be different, and so blows away your old commit and any parent
> commit references and such.
>
> I read someplace, I can't remember where at this point, that if git-p4
> used notes to write the P4 change information, that would not impact
> the commit hash, so when merging back, things would not be
> overwritten, and you can maintain branches and commit history properly
> in git.
>
> I just ran into this project, where it seems that someone has
> re-written git-p4 to use notes: https://github.com/ermshiperete/git-p4
>
> I was wondering if any of the maintainers of git-p4 has considered
> this, and might want to leverage this work to merge into the main git
> repo, possibly with an option to choose between the two behaviors.
I'm not sure I qualify for such a grand title as maintainer, but I was
going to give this a go in the new year as it would be quite useful,
unless someone beat me to it. I want to fix some problems with labels
first though.
Regards!
Luke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-16 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-16 16:07 git-p4 using notes Michael Horowitz
2011-12-16 19:55 ` Luke Diamand [this message]
2011-12-17 0:57 ` Michael Horowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEBA24F.8030103@diamand.org \
--to=luke@diamand.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.horowitz@ieee.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).