From: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
To: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Interactive rebase with submodules
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:38:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F172DBB.4080303@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F16AB2E.30706@metanate.com>
Am 18.01.2012 12:21, schrieb John Keeping:
> On 17/01/12 21:29, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>> Am 17.01.2012 19:47, schrieb John Keeping:
>>> This appears to be because the git-rebase--interactive script inspects whether there is anything to commit when `rebase --continue` is invoked by running:
>>>
>>> git diff-index --cached --quiet --ignore-submodules HEAD --
>>
>>> Is there a reason for the `--ignore-submodules` in this command? Removing that option results in the expected behaviour.
>>
>> Yes, removing it will help your use case but break others. The reason
>> for that is that because submodules are not updated during a rebase
>> it doesn't make sense to compare their HEAD to what is recorded in
>> the superproject, as that might have been changed by an earlier
>> commit. And as the submodules HEAD hasn't been updated back then,
>> it is stale and will always show up as modified (even if it wasn't).
>
> Is this worse than the current behaviour?
If we break established behavior that would be worse unless we have
a *very* good reason to do so. But please see below ...
> If I perform a rebase where there is a (non-submodule) conflict in a commit where a submodule changes I can see something like:
>
> # Changes to be committed:
> # modified: path/to/submodule
> #
> # Unmerged paths:
> # both modified: path/to/file
> #
> # Changes not staged for commit:
> # modified: path/to/submodule (new commits)
>
> This occurs if a later commit in the rebase will modify the submodule. In this case, `rebase --continue` correctly recreates the commit once I have resolved the conflict in the file, ignoring the unstaged submodule changes.
Yeah, as rebase doesn't touch the submodules, that is expected.
>>> I can understand not updating submodules while running the rebase, but I expected that having resolved a conflict and added my change to the index it would be applied by `git rebase --continue`, as indeed it is if there happen to be other (non-submodule) changes in the same commit.
>>
>> The irony is that you would have to update submodules (or at least
>> their HEAD and use "--ignore-submodules=dirty") while running rebase
>> to make that work in all cases ;-)
>
> I don't this this is the case, since diff-tree is being invoked with --cached won't it ignore changes in the work tree anyway?
Right, thanks for nudging me with the clue bat ...
I missed the "--cached" option and did not question if the code does
what the commit message of 6848d58c6 (where the --ignore-submodules
option was introduced) said:
Ignore dirty submodule states during rebase and stash
When rebasing or stashing, chances are that you do not care about
dirty submodules, since they are not updated by those actions anyway.
So ignore the submodules' states.
Note: the submodule states -- as committed in the superproject --
will still be stashed and rebased, it is _just_ the state of the
submodule in the working tree which is ignored.
I think this logic misses the case when only submodule changes are left
in a commit.
>> But just updating the HEAD would be dangerous as you would have to be
>> very careful to restore the submodules HEAD after the rebase, or the
>> submodule's work tree will be out of sync.
>
> Just updating HEAD in the submodule without touching its work tree doesn't seem like a good idea. I think it will cause a lot more confusion when running `git status` which will show unexpected modified content for the submodule.
Yes, we agree here.
> Since I did not expect rebase to perform a submodule update, I was not surprised to see unstaged submodule changes when rebasing, but I did expect rebase to commit anything I had added to the index.
Right.
I'll have to add some tests for that case, but I doubt I'll manage that
today. Until I can provide a complete patch, this diff should fix your
problem (no, I did not test if that change is enough to fix the problem,
but at least it does not break the test suite ;-):
---------------8<--------------
diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
index 5812222..4546749 100644
--- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
+++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ rearrange_squash () {
case "$action" in
continue)
# do we have anything to commit?
- if git diff-index --cached --quiet --ignore-submodules HEAD --
+ if git diff-index --cached --quiet HEAD --
then
: Nothing to commit -- skip this
else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-18 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-17 18:47 Interactive rebase with submodules John Keeping
2012-01-17 21:29 ` Jens Lehmann
2012-01-18 11:21 ` John Keeping
2012-01-18 20:38 ` Jens Lehmann [this message]
2012-01-19 10:48 ` John Keeping
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F172DBB.4080303@web.de \
--to=jens.lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john@metanate.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).