From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Haggerty Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2012, #05; Mon, 23) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:35:05 +0100 Message-ID: <4F1E6D39.1080506@alum.mit.edu> References: <7vmx9d6hpw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 24 09:35:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RpbqX-0002K3-8A for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:35:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754840Ab2AXIfL (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:35:11 -0500 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:46619 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754633Ab2AXIfK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:35:10 -0500 X-Envelope-From: mhagger@alum.mit.edu Received: from [192.168.100.152] (ssh.berlin.jpk.com [212.222.128.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id q0O8Z52M014913 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:35:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.16 In-Reply-To: <7vmx9d6hpw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 01/24/2012 01:56 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Here are the topics that have been cooking. [...] > * mh/ref-api-rest (2011-12-12) 35 commits > . [...] > > I had to remove this temporarily out of 'pu' as I didn't want to deal with > merge conflicts with the mh/ref-clone-without-extra-refs topic that > removes yet another caller of add_extra_ref() that this series touches. Yes, I agree; the branch can be put on ice. After I find the time to remove the last user of extra_refs, I plan to rework the branch with no support for extra_refs at all. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/