From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] run-command: Error out if interpreter not found Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:55:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4F205028.4060606@kdbg.org> References: <1327444346-6243-1-git-send-email-fransklaver@gmail.com> <1327444346-6243-6-git-send-email-fransklaver@gmail.com> <20120124232421.GH8222@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C. Hamano" To: Frans Klaver X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 25 19:56:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq80t-0006fL-Lh for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:56:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751601Ab2AYS4C (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:56:02 -0500 Received: from bsmtp5.bon.at ([195.3.86.187]:65264 "EHLO lbmfmo03.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751030Ab2AYS4B (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:56:01 -0500 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at (unknown [192.168.181.105]) by lbmfmo03.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302AA11947C for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:57:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BBE2C4007; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:56:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6EC19F32A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:55:36 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111101 SUSE/3.1.16 Thunderbird/3.1.16 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 25.01.2012 08:12, schrieb Frans Klaver: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:24:21 +0100, Jonathan Nieder >> What happens on Windows? > > I didn't plan anything to happen on windows. Doesn't POSIXPERM rule that > OS out? It does; these tests are skipped on Windows. > I guess it could use similar code to this patch series to tackle > all this. No thanks. IMHO, this is already too much code for too little gain. -- Hannes