From: Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Edit a rerere conflict resolution
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:14:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F636700.2090105@lyx.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vaa3gilg7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Op 16-3-2012 17:01, Junio C Hamano schreef:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn<vfr@lyx.org> writes:
>
>> Op 12-3-2012 21:01, Junio C Hamano schreef:
>> ...
>>> I haven't find it necessary in practice, as the re-fix for me
>>> typically would go like this:
>>>
>>> $ git merge other-branch
>>> ... rerere kicks in; eyeball the results
>>> ... ah, my earlier resolution is no longer correct
>>> $ edit $the_path
>>> ... test the result of manual edit in the context of the merged whole
>>> ... and be satisified
>>> $ git rerere forget $the_path
>>> $ git add $the_path
>>> $ git commit
>>> ... rerere records the updated resolution
>>>
>> This doesn't really work for me:
>>
>> $ git merge other-branch
>> Auto-merging<path>
>> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflicts in<path>
>> Resolved '<path>' using previous resolution.
>> Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
>>
>> $ git rerere status
>> $ git rerere forget<path>
>> error: no remembered resolution for<path>
>>
>> $ edit<path>
>> $ git commit -a -m "fix"
>> ... no sign of rerere doing something.
>>
>> Why is this different from what you describe above, and how can I
>> modify the recorded resolution ?
> Do you have rerere.autoupdate set by any chance? If so, don't. At least
> when you are trying to purge the broken rerere entry.
No, I turned rerere.autoupdate off. Proven in the above by the line
"Resolved... " instead of "Staged...".
Vincent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-16 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-12 19:14 Edit a rerere conflict resolution Vincent van Ravesteijn
2012-03-12 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 20:20 ` Vincent van Ravesteijn
2012-03-12 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 21:21 ` Vincent van Ravesteijn
2012-03-12 21:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-12 21:39 ` Vincent van Ravesteijn
2012-03-12 21:40 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-12 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 15:54 ` Vincent van Ravesteijn
2012-03-16 16:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 16:14 ` Vincent van Ravesteijn [this message]
2012-03-16 16:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 16:37 ` Vincent van Ravesteijn
2012-03-16 16:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-17 11:03 ` Vincent van Ravesteijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F636700.2090105@lyx.org \
--to=vfr@lyx.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).