From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Christopher Tiwald <christiwald@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net,
Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Subject: [fixup PATCH] push: Provide situational hints for non-fast-forward errors
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:10:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F64C58B.4000207@in.waw.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vlin1gl9l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 03/16/2012 06:36 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> +static const char message_advice_pull_before_push[] =
> + N_("Update was rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind\n"
> + "the remote. Merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull') before\n"
> + "pushing again. See the 'Note about fast-forwards' section of\n"
> + "'git push --help' for details.");
> +
> +
> +static const char message_advice_use_upstream[] =
> + N_("Some of your local branches were stale with respect to their\n"
> + "remote counterparts. If you did not intend to push these branches,\n"
> + "you may want to set the 'push.default' configuration variable to\n"
> + "'current' or 'upstream' to push only the current branch.");
> +
> +static const char message_advice_checkout_pull_push[] =
> + N_("Updates were rejected because the tip of some of your branches are\n"
> + "behind the remote. Check out the branch and merge the remote\n"
> + "changes (e.g. 'git pull') before pushing again. See the\n"
> + "'Note about fast-forwards' section of 'git push --help'\n"
> + "for details.");
Hi,
Clemens' observation that there are unnecessary differences between
"message_advice_use_upstream" and "message_advice_checkout_pull_push"
is valid. There also was a grammatical error in message_advice_checkout_pull_push
("the tip ... are behind") and some tense/number inconsistencies.
I think the following can be squashed into 'fixup push-non-ff advice':
- always start with "Updates were rejected", i.e. explain what is why
git is talking
- consistently use present tense to talk about stuff which is still true
- mention that branches to be pushed can be specified (add
" explicitly specify branches to push or" in
"you may want to set the 'push.default' configuration variable")
- use the simpler "tip of your branch is behind the remote" instead of the more
complicated and longer "some of your branches are stale with respect to their
remote counterparts".
- resolve the "tip ... are" problem by using singular and talking about
a single branch. This way there is no conflict with the following
sentence which talks about checking out a single branch.
- rewrap the text to 72 lines (standard TeX paragraph width).
(One line is 73 characters, but it seems better than the
alternative which makes the text take an extra line).
[I know that this mixes whitespace/layout changes with the rest, but the texts were mostly rewritten anyway.]
Zbyszek
------ 8< --------
From ef8d15494d518df809e4a822af0d0e1c4008c91e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Zbigniew=20J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:00:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! fixup push-non-ff advice
---
builtin/push.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/push.c b/builtin/push.c
index 511a3ba..4c5b52b 100644
--- a/builtin/push.c
+++ b/builtin/push.c
@@ -142,24 +142,21 @@ static void setup_default_push_refspecs(struct remote *remote)
}
static const char message_advice_pull_before_push[] =
- N_("Update was rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind\n"
- "the remote. Merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull') before\n"
- "pushing again. See the 'Note about fast-forwards' section of\n"
- "'git push --help' for details.");
-
+ N_("Update was rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind the\n"
+ "remote. Merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull') before pushing again.\n"
+ "See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.");
static const char message_advice_use_upstream[] =
- N_("Some of your local branches were stale with respect to their\n"
- "remote counterparts. If you did not intend to push these branches,\n"
- "you may want to set the 'push.default' configuration variable to\n"
- "'current' or 'upstream' to push only the current branch.");
+ N_("Updates were rejected because a tip of your branch is behind the remote.\n"
+ "If you did not intend to push that branch, you may want to explicitly\n"
+ "specify branches to push or set the 'push.default' configuration variable"
+ "to 'current' or 'upstream' to always push only the current branch.");
static const char message_advice_checkout_pull_push[] =
- N_("Updates were rejected because the tip of some of your branches are\n"
- "behind the remote. Check out the branch and merge the remote\n"
- "changes (e.g. 'git pull') before pushing again. See the\n"
- "'Note about fast-forwards' section of 'git push --help'\n"
- "for details.");
+ N_("Updates were rejected because a tip of your branch is behind the remote.\n"
+ "Check out this branch and merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull')\n"
+ "before pushing again.\n"
+ "See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.");
static void advise_pull_before_push(void)
{
--
1.7.10.rc0.162.g5dce3
------ >8 --------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-17 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-13 23:22 [PATCH] push: Provide situational hints for non-fast-forward errors Christopher Tiwald
2012-03-14 4:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-14 12:14 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2012-03-14 13:00 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-14 14:27 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2012-03-14 16:40 ` Christopher Tiwald
2012-03-15 8:54 ` Clemens Buchacher
2012-03-15 18:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 8:19 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-14 14:48 ` Christopher Tiwald
2012-03-14 14:53 ` Christopher Tiwald
2012-03-14 9:06 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-03-14 15:52 ` Christopher Tiwald
2012-03-14 17:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 5:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 9:10 ` Clemens Buchacher
2012-03-16 12:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 17:20 ` Christopher Tiwald
2012-03-16 18:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 21:41 ` Clemens Buchacher
2012-03-16 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-16 22:01 ` Clemens Buchacher
2012-03-16 22:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-17 17:10 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [this message]
2012-03-17 18:46 ` [fixup PATCH] " Christopher Tiwald
2012-03-17 19:42 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2012-03-19 0:15 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F64C58B.4000207@in.waw.pl \
--to=zbyszek@in.waw.pl \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=christiwald@gmail.com \
--cc=drizzd@aon.at \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).