From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Todoroski Subject: Re: Clone fails on a repo with too many heads/tags Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:30:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4F6F39FC.2070801@gmx.net> References: <20120318190659.GA24829@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20120319024436.GB10426@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4F69B5F0.2060605@gmx.net> <20120321171423.GA13140@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4F6A33C5.2080909@gmx.net> <20120321201722.GA15021@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4F6E3373.7090500@gmx.net> <20120325010609.GB27651@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Shawn Pearce , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 25 17:29:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SBpO9-00073H-07 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:29:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756368Ab2CYP3o (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:29:44 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:34352 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756285Ab2CYP3n (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:29:43 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2012 15:29:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [127.0.0.1]) [77.28.166.17] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 25 Mar 2012 17:29:41 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14478976 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/949ghyEL9QxR2kNnqUkM4ajkayzRuDOMgqRboyY pQPF2EULr3KMQl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) In-Reply-To: <20120325010609.GB27651@sigill.intra.peff.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 25.03.2012 03:06, Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:49:55PM +0100, Ivan Todoroski wrote: > >> Is it failing for anyone else on the vanilla "maint" branch? I would >> appreciate any help I could get here. > > No, it passes fine here (Debian unstable). OK, thanks for checking, it's good to know. > Does your machine have mod_rewrite installed and enabled? I would think > apache would complain at startup if it wasn't. I wonder if there's > something non-portable in the minimal apache config we ship. Looks like it comes by default with the RPM. Maybe the Apache version is too old? $ rpm -q httpd httpd-2.2.3-63.el5.centos.1 $ rpm -ql httpd | grep rewrite /usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_rewrite.so $ ls -l /usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_rewrite.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 60384 Feb 23 19:23 /usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_rewrite.so $ ls -l trash\ directory.t5551-http-fetch/httpd/modules/mod_rewrite.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 60384 Feb 23 19:23 trash directory.t5551-http-fetch/httpd/modules/mod_rewrite.so Also, mod_rewrite is enabled in both the master config file /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, as well as the minimal git/t/lib-httpd/apache.conf. > Does httpd/error.log in the trash directory say anything interesting? Nothing, it just gives the startup and shutdown message: $ cat trash\ directory.t5551-http-fetch/httpd/error.log [Sun Mar 25 15:27:12 2012] [notice] Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) configured -- resuming normal operations [Sun Mar 25 15:27:12 2012] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down I will try your patch from the other message a bit later and let you know.