From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Todoroski Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] fetch-pack: new option to read refs from stdin Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:49:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4F70AC47.1010405@gmx.net> References: <20120319024436.GB10426@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4F69B5F0.2060605@gmx.net> <20120321171423.GA13140@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4F6A33C5.2080909@gmx.net> <20120321201722.GA15021@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4F6E3446.9080001@gmx.net> <20120325011948.GC27651@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4F6F7941.8060008@gmx.net> <20120326172145.GC7942@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Shawn Pearce , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 26 19:49:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SCE37-0001jE-F3 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:49:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933142Ab2CZRtk (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:49:40 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:54486 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932903Ab2CZRtj (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:49:39 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2012 17:49:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [127.0.0.1]) [77.28.170.173] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 26 Mar 2012 19:49:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14478976 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+RHwxJzyWRo3CQxRo1gTu2lAdevyEpSNcl8dfuCu bc+fwDWxP+4sEw User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) In-Reply-To: <20120326172145.GC7942@sigill.intra.peff.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 26.03.2012 19:21, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:00:01PM +0200, Ivan Todoroski wrote: > >> On 25.03.2012 03:19, Jeff King wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:53:26PM +0100, Ivan Todoroski wrote: >>> I think there is a minor formatting bug in the above. Asciidoc will make >>> your two paragraphs into a single one, won't it? I think you need to do >>> the (horribly ugly): >>> >>> --stdin:: >>> First paragraph. >>> + >>> Second paragraph. >> Apparently this works too (i.e. indent the "+" too): >> >> --stdin:: >> First paragraph. >> + >> Second paragraph. > > Sadly, it's not quite the same (because I consider the source of your > version much more readable). The diff of the resulting HTML between my > version and yours is: > > --- no-indent.html 2012-03-26 13:19:26.206728013 -0400 > +++ indent.html 2012-03-26 13:19:04.270727319 -0400 > @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ >
>

> First paragraph. > +
> + Second paragraph. >

> -

Second paragraph.

>
> > > So in your case it is putting in a line break, but not actually starting > a new paragraph. > > -Peff Ah, that's too bad. OK, I guess we have two options: 1) Unindent the second paragraph - looks ugly in source but good in final output. 2) Just merge the two paragraphs into a single paragraph. It's not that much text anyway, it doesn't really *have* to be in two paragraphs. Let me know which option you prefer.