From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Sayers Subject: Re: GSoC Project Proposal - Project Code Graph - Need mentor and better name Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:32:27 +0100 Message-ID: <4F7EAA1B.206@pileofstuff.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Suhail Sherif X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 06 10:32:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SG4az-0005pq-Id for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:32:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754688Ab2DFIcd (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2012 04:32:33 -0400 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]:30513 "EHLO mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751588Ab2DFIcc (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2012 04:32:32 -0400 Received: from aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20120406083229.JDDV18388.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:32:29 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [94.170.150.126]) by aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.3.00.04.00 201-2196-133-20080908) with ESMTP id <20120406083229.PYSD3795.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.0.2]>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:32:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20 In-Reply-To: X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=R50lirqlHffDPPkwUlkuVa99MrvKdVWo//yz83qex8g= c=1 sm=0 a=yXtjXN6ItgYA:10 a=w0tEJP1bM9IA:10 a=u4BGzq-dJbcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=_6RVTZWCXDQIIPQDEHwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Making projects more accessible to new people is always a good idea, but how would you extract the information? Many projects have a hard time just getting programmers to document their code, so anything like this would have to be very low maintenance if you want to help projects that are currently bad at accessibility. I think a solid plan for that part of the problem would make it more obvious which organisation would be best suited to you.