git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
To: Nathan Gray <n8gray@n8gray.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why aren't tag refs namespaced?
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:06:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F99AACC.2050409@xiplink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+7g9Jxc6eaCUR8aVhqKH--sOrvQVrZn+se7wtFJsOiKNjz9Pg@mail.gmail.com>

On 12-04-26 02:40 PM, Nathan Gray wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> Namespacing works really well for branch refs.  I know that
> remotes/origin/master is origin's master branch.  I may or may not
> have a master branch, and it may or may not have anything in common
> with origin's.  Our repositories are independent, after all, so it
> makes sense that our refs would live in different namespaces.
> 
> So why is it that tag refs don't follow this model?  Why is my
> "best-commit-ever" tag assumed to be the same as origin's?  Given a
> ref in refs/tags it's unclear if the ref is public, private, on origin
> or not on origin.  Will pushing my tags create anything new or not?
> Who knows?  Compare this to branches, where the same questions are
> easy to answer thanks to namespacing.

There was lengthy, but inconclusive, discussion about this a year ago:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/165799/focus=166290

		M.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-26 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-26 18:40 Why aren't tag refs namespaced? Nathan Gray
2012-04-26 19:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-26 23:33   ` Nathan Gray
2012-04-27  3:26     ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-26 20:06 ` Marc Branchaud [this message]
2012-04-26 23:34   ` Nathan Gray
     [not found] ` <CABURp0okZ=-sq7e0ReUepCOEUC=9r2845wQ6H3HhruRg8Jd6Dg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-26 23:48   ` Nathan Gray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F99AACC.2050409@xiplink.com \
    --to=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=n8gray@n8gray.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).