From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Stange Subject: Re: [RFC] Deal with HTTP 401 by requesting credentials. Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:18:33 -0500 Message-ID: <4FC7FC49.4030503@steadfast.net> References: <4FC7EFB7.4090704@steadfast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 01 01:18:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SaEdc-0007iW-7z for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 01:18:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758607Ab2EaXSg (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 19:18:36 -0400 Received: from staffmx.steadfast.net ([67.202.100.6]:52579 "EHLO staffmx.steadfast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758594Ab2EaXSf (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 19:18:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by staffmx.steadfast.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B185E7C4001 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:18:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at steadfast.net Received: from staffmx.steadfast.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (staffmx.steadfast.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1ESh+YZ9p-D for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:18:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ziyal.office.steadfast.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:f128:0:1:222:4dff:fe51:2ed5]) by staffmx.steadfast.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 189F07C4002 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:18:34 -0500 (CDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4FC7EFB7.4090704@steadfast.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 05/31/2012 05:24 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > Apologies for anything wrong I might have done here. I'm not used to > procedures for this sort of patch submission, or terribly familiar with > the code base. I'm seeking advice on whether this approach is sane or > completely crazy, and I'm willing to adjust it to make it suitable for > inclusion. Of course, I failed to get my email client to send the patch unwrapped. Only one line appears to have been affected, but I don't think this is a final patch. I'll be sure to make a proper submission for any future patches I send. Sorry! -- Kevin Stange Chief Technology Officer Steadfast Networks http://steadfast.net Phone: 312-602-2689 ext. 203 | Fax: 312-602-2688 | Cell: 312-320-5867