From: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
To: Sascha Cunz <sascha-ml@babbelbox.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git pull with submodule
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:24:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE75B62.9020107@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1564611.U3XyAbWYKV@toshi>
Am 23.06.2012 15:53, schrieb Sascha Cunz:
> I noticed the following behaviour when pulling a repository that has a
> submodule.
>
> I have a standalone checkout of my subproject, which I regulary sync it with
> its upstream and push the result to github. Then I go to my project where the
> github repository is setup to be a subproject, 'cd' into the subproject and do
> 'git pull' there. After that, I commit the subproject blob into the
> superproject.
>
> Now i switch OS and/or workstation and do a 'git pull' ( in root directory of
> superproject ). Git then
> -> fetches new objects of superproject
> -> fetches new objects of subproject
> -> checks out the subproject to the SHA1 currently recorded in
> the subproject blob. (Am i right on this one?)
No, you have to issue a "git submodule update" to check out the submodule
according to the commit that is registered in the superproject. Only the
SHA1 currently recorded in the superproject will be updated when the merge
succeeds, the submodules work tree and HEAD stays untouched.
> -> merges superproject with it's upstream
>
> After that, i have to cd into the subproject and 'git pull' there again,
> because it just fetched the objects but did no merge nor checkout.
Hmm, the merge of the submodule commits in the superproject should have
already been done by your pull there (as I understand your use case you
only move the submodules commits forward, so there are no merge conflicts
to be expected). Just doing a "git submodule update" in the superproject
after the pull should do the trick.
> Is this intentional behaviour or am i doing something wrong / have wrong
> expectations in that "after seeing it recurring into the subproject, i expect
> i don't need to do further steps in order to have it up to date"?
This is the way things currently work. There is ongoing work to get rid
of the need to run "git submodule update" when the commit recorded in
the superproject changes due to a checkout, pull or whatever, but we're
not there yet.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-24 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-23 13:53 git pull with submodule Sascha Cunz
2012-06-24 18:24 ` Jens Lehmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE75B62.9020107@web.de \
--to=jens.lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sascha-ml@babbelbox.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).