git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>,
	Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git submodule vs GIT_WORK_TREE
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:27:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE9FF0C.8050409@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vobo6cazk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Am 26.06.2012 18:07, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> As you are most likely aware, `git submodule` allows you to access a
>> separate git repository in a sub-directory, e.g. $submodule, while
>> $GIT_WORK_TREE forces git to operate in a specific directory. Combine
>> the two and the result is less than ideal. git is forced to operate in
>> $GIT_WORK_TREE while it should operate on $GIT_WORK_TREE/$submodule,
>> instead.

Richard, could you please tell us what git commands behave strange
in what way and what your expectations were? A short test shows e.g.
"git submodule foreach" operates on $(pwd)/submodule even though
GIT_WORK_TREE is set while at the same time git status shows the same
submodule as missing because it is looking for it in $GIT_WORK_TREE.
Is that what you are talking about?

> The end user should not be asked to anything special.
> 
> When the user exports GIT_WORK_TREE to tell git that the root of the
> working tree the user wants to work on resides there (which is
> needed when the user exports GIT_DIR to tell git that the user wants
> to work on that repository), that wish obviously applies only to
> that repository.  If git decides to visit the working tree of a
> different repository (e.g. a checkout of a submodule bound to the
> project GIT_WORK_TREE points at), even if it is done in response to
> the user action (e.g. like passing "--recurse-submodules" option),
> it should adjust GIT_WORK_TREE and GIT_DIR to be appropriate for
> operations in the submodule repository while doing so.  If the more
> recent "recursive" behaviour forgets to do so, it simply is a bug.

I'm not sure what you mean by "appropriate for operations in the
submodule repository". Should the submodule work tree be searched
for under $GIT_WORK_TREE of the superproject or under $(pwd)?

As far as I can see all submodule code consistently clears all
environment variables used by git before descending into a
submodule (at least since February 2010 and 5ce9086dd). Maybe we
should change that so it sets the GIT_WORK_TREE environment to
"$GIT_WORK_TREE/submodule" to be consistent?

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-26 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-26 12:28 git submodule vs GIT_WORK_TREE Richard Hartmann
2012-06-26 16:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-26 18:27   ` Jens Lehmann [this message]
2012-06-26 19:51     ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-26 22:30       ` Jens Lehmann
2012-06-26 22:53         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-29  8:43           ` Richard Hartmann
2012-06-29 20:03             ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-29 20:23               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-29 21:03               ` Junio C Hamano
2012-07-01 10:34                 ` Richard Hartmann
2012-07-02  8:22                   ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-29  9:10     ` Richard Hartmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE9FF0C.8050409@web.de \
    --to=jens.lehmann@web.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=richih.mailinglist@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).