From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael J Gruber Subject: Re: [RFC] l10n: de.po: translate 29 new messages Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:20:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF72C70.1010202@drmicha.warpmail.net> References: <1341335086-6767-1-git-send-email-ralf.thielow@gmail.com> <2021839.rMjHRWft8I@cs-pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andreas Schwab , Christian Stimming , trast@student.ethz.ch, jk@jk.gs, worldhello.net@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Ralf Thielow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 06 20:20:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SnD9A-0003cW-Km for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:20:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757531Ab2GFSUr (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:20:47 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:52689 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755814Ab2GFSUq (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:20:46 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id D051420E33; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:20:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:20:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=ZJxwK0iKHhTpgCJ6SIwloy zgKbQ=; b=lW2GW1qvcSuQWhrTrGze2RNNVcKos7TjennuDBNm3pQHF40rxpySZR Ovuxoluw/r1GpAMDzU92AKthWk6iVURj9ryzHd8XfMUv/jeAPWZ5PKSV65rCH/iL Yv5OvL6WSJOnPV5kmcp4kzm41vk4TkBK/4mjmU08INhJlpHMv07ps= X-Sasl-enc: K5EIYYt2tD6hsiKXZ2Kp6oCN+VqWYyhL+Ccm1a+GsGI4 1341598845 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [79.199.75.129]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1FBCA483532; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:20:33 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ralf Thielow venit, vidit, dixit 05.07.2012 20:16: >>>> Is "rebase" = "Neuaufbau"? My last thought on this wording was "rebase" = >>>> "Umpflanzen". >> >> "Basisumbau"? >> > > I have added both suggestions to the glossary that they don't get lost when > we discuss about non-optimal and/or missing parts within the glossary. Not the base is being reconstructed, but what's on top of it. So, "Basiswechsel" would be more appropriate. But: "Umpflanzen" is really a great term which stays within the context of trees, roots and branches. Strictly speaking, "Umpflanzen" refers to something you do at the root level. The corresponding action for branches would be "Umpfropfen". I think that also conveys the effort that is sometimes necessary ;) Michael