git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
To: Radu Manea <RManea@luxoft.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: congif spec in GIT
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 20:28:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF87FC0.2080900@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF6D022.10801@itcnetworks.ro>

On 06.07.12 13:46, Radu Manea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the detailed presentation posted on git.or.cz site.
>
> One question: is there any equivalent config spec file for GIT as is in ClearCase today?

There are similarities, and differences between git and ClearCase,
I can only point out the very basic differences,
because the philosophy of these 2 tools is completely different.


CC has a "virtual file system", often mounted on /vobs on Unix,
and M:\ (or another drive name) on Windows.

CC simulates a file system, where files are seen according
to the config spec. Changing the config spec will change the
version of the files seen under /vobs immediately.

If you want a copy of all the files on your local disk,
you need to create a "snapshot view". After changing
the config spec, the snapshot view needs to be updated.

git always has a "working tree", similar to a "snapshot view"
(except for "bare repositories", they correspond to a CC server)


CC uses branches
git uses branches

CC uses labels
git uses commit ids, A tag may point to a commit id

CC defines for each file/directory which label is used
    When a file is checked out, a branch is created for that file element
   different directories may use different branches
- git uses the same branch for the whole repo

CC uses labels for each directory, whatever the config spec say for that 
very directory.
- git uses a commit id as a base for that branch.


So if try to transform "a branch in git" into a config spec,
we do:

$ git status
# On branch my_feature_branch
  (and that branch is defined on the whole working tree, similar to 
/vobs/projects/git/tb)

If I open the "engine bonnet" of git, to see what that means 
technically, I run on the command line:

$ cat .git/HEAD ref: refs/heads/my_feature_branch
(we are on branch my_feature_branch)

When I dig further:

$ cat .git/refs/heads/my_feature_branch
a5b0a8ff7f48cfd5ea19712680c64a029e99c2ba

We see that my branch is taking commit a5b08ff7 as a base line


So a "config spec" could include 3 lines, kind of
"all files are CHECKOUT/CHECKIN"
"All files are based on commit id a5b0a8ff7f48cfd5ea19712680c64a029e99c2ba"
"If you commit one or more files at once, they are recorded on branch 
"my_feature_branch"

HTH
/Torsten

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-07 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-06 11:46 congif spec in GIT Radu Manea
2012-07-06 15:55 ` Neal Kreitzinger
2012-07-07  9:53 ` Robin Rosenberg
2012-07-07 18:28 ` Torsten Bögershausen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FF87FC0.2080900@web.de \
    --to=tboegi@web.de \
    --cc=RManea@luxoft.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).