From: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
To: Radu Manea <RManea@luxoft.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: congif spec in GIT
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 20:28:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF87FC0.2080900@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF6D022.10801@itcnetworks.ro>
On 06.07.12 13:46, Radu Manea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the detailed presentation posted on git.or.cz site.
>
> One question: is there any equivalent config spec file for GIT as is in ClearCase today?
There are similarities, and differences between git and ClearCase,
I can only point out the very basic differences,
because the philosophy of these 2 tools is completely different.
CC has a "virtual file system", often mounted on /vobs on Unix,
and M:\ (or another drive name) on Windows.
CC simulates a file system, where files are seen according
to the config spec. Changing the config spec will change the
version of the files seen under /vobs immediately.
If you want a copy of all the files on your local disk,
you need to create a "snapshot view". After changing
the config spec, the snapshot view needs to be updated.
git always has a "working tree", similar to a "snapshot view"
(except for "bare repositories", they correspond to a CC server)
CC uses branches
git uses branches
CC uses labels
git uses commit ids, A tag may point to a commit id
CC defines for each file/directory which label is used
When a file is checked out, a branch is created for that file element
different directories may use different branches
- git uses the same branch for the whole repo
CC uses labels for each directory, whatever the config spec say for that
very directory.
- git uses a commit id as a base for that branch.
So if try to transform "a branch in git" into a config spec,
we do:
$ git status
# On branch my_feature_branch
(and that branch is defined on the whole working tree, similar to
/vobs/projects/git/tb)
If I open the "engine bonnet" of git, to see what that means
technically, I run on the command line:
$ cat .git/HEAD ref: refs/heads/my_feature_branch
(we are on branch my_feature_branch)
When I dig further:
$ cat .git/refs/heads/my_feature_branch
a5b0a8ff7f48cfd5ea19712680c64a029e99c2ba
We see that my branch is taking commit a5b08ff7 as a base line
So a "config spec" could include 3 lines, kind of
"all files are CHECKOUT/CHECKIN"
"All files are based on commit id a5b0a8ff7f48cfd5ea19712680c64a029e99c2ba"
"If you commit one or more files at once, they are recorded on branch
"my_feature_branch"
HTH
/Torsten
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-07 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-06 11:46 congif spec in GIT Radu Manea
2012-07-06 15:55 ` Neal Kreitzinger
2012-07-07 9:53 ` Robin Rosenberg
2012-07-07 18:28 ` Torsten Bögershausen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF87FC0.2080900@web.de \
--to=tboegi@web.de \
--cc=RManea@luxoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).