From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
To: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Bob Halley <halley@play-bow.org>, Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] submodules: don't stumble over symbolic links when cloning recursively
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:10:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFDCFA4.9060602@kdbg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFDC1EE.8080106@web.de>
Am 11.07.2012 20:11, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
> Since 69c305178 (submodules: refactor computation of relative gitdir path)
> cloning a submodule recursively fails for recursive submodules when a
> symbolic link is part of the path to the work tree of the superproject.
>
> This happens when module_clone() tries to find the relative paths between
> work tree and git dir. When a symbolic link in current $PWD points to a
> directory in a different level determining the number of "../" needed to
> traverse to the superprojects work tree leads to a wrong result.
>
> As there is no portable way to say "pwd -P" use cd_to_toplevel to remove
> the link from the pwd, which fixes this problem.
...
> - a=$(cd "$gitdir" && pwd)/
> - b=$(cd "$sm_path" && pwd)/
> + a=$(cd_to_toplevel && cd "$gitdir" && pwd)/
> + b=$(cd_to_toplevel && cd "$sm_path" && pwd)/
But if you cd out, how can it be correct not to cd in again if $gitdir
and/or $sm_path are relative?
And if $gitdir and/or $sm_path are absolute, how can the earlier
cd_to_toplevel make a difference?
> +test_expect_success 'submodule update can handle symbolic links in pwd' '
Please add a SYMLINKS prerequisite.
> + mkdir -p linked/dir &&
> + ln -s linked/dir linkto &&
> + (
> + cd linkto &&
> + git clone "$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/super_update_r2 super &&
> + (
> + cd super &&
> + git submodule update --init --recursive
> + )
> + )
> +'
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-11 18:11 [PATCH] submodules: don't stumble over symbolic links when cloning recursively Jens Lehmann
2012-07-11 19:10 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2012-07-11 20:06 ` Jens Lehmann
2012-07-11 20:39 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-07-11 21:08 ` Jens Lehmann
2012-07-12 17:12 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFDCFA4.9060602@kdbg.org \
--to=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=halley@play-bow.org \
--cc=phil.hord@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).