From: Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bash: offer to show (un)staged changes
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:48:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ac8254d0902011448t242e7fcek3ae7fda609648ef0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090119172939.GA14053@spearce.org>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes:
>>
>> > + if test ! -z "$GIT_PS1_EXPENSIVE"; then
>> > + git update-index --refresh >/dev/null 2>&1 || w="*"
>>
>> This makes the feature unavailable for people who care about the stat
>> dirtiness and explicitly set diff.autorefreshindex to false, doesn't it?
>
> Yup, and I'm one of those people who sets autorefresindex to false
> in my ~/.gitconfig, usually before I even have user.{name,email} set.
>
> I do like the idea of what Thomas is trying to do here, but its
> so bloody expensive to compute dirty state on every prompt in
> some repositories that I'd shoot myself. E.g. WebKit is huge,
I've been thinking about this and wondered
whether implementing "status --mini" or
"status --short" which prints "+?*" in wt-status.c
could be made fast enough.
Should we try to implement and profile this
or do we know it will be slow beforehand?
I am actually using this feature on the bash
prompt via calls to git commands and parsing
for added=+, unknown=? and changed=* as
others have done in combination with __git_ps1.
> computing the dirty state inside of the WebKit repository on each
> prompt would absolutely kill CLI performance to a point of it not
> being usuable. But git.git is small enough its OK on pretty much
> everything except Cygwin.
>
> So as much as I'd like to use this without the update-index --refresh
> bit, I'm not sure its viable in every project out there. If we had
> an inotify sort of daemon to keep the data current so the prompt
> doesn't have to stat every source file on every display it would
> be reasonable, but we don't have such a thing yet for Git.
>
> --
> Shawn.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-01 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-18 0:56 [PATCH] bash: offer to show (un)staged changes Thomas Rast
2009-01-18 1:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-18 2:06 ` Thomas Rast
2009-01-19 17:29 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-01-19 18:00 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-01-19 18:11 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-01-19 18:28 ` Mike Hommey
2009-01-19 18:42 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-01-19 19:06 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2009-01-19 19:12 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-01-19 19:01 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2009-01-19 21:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Rast
2009-02-01 22:13 ` Thomas Rast
2009-02-01 22:29 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-02-03 9:20 ` [PATCH v3] " Thomas Rast
2009-02-03 18:11 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-02-01 22:48 ` Tuncer Ayaz [this message]
2009-02-01 23:43 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
2009-02-02 0:50 ` Tuncer Ayaz
2009-02-02 19:31 ` Tuncer Ayaz
2009-01-18 2:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-18 2:32 ` Thomas Rast
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ac8254d0902011448t242e7fcek3ae7fda609648ef0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).