From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel Berlin" Subject: Re: git annotate runs out of memory Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:53:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4aca3dc20712110953h13e3c33ftb310609bbac6a0a8@mail.gmail.com> References: <4aca3dc20712110933i636342fbifb15171d3e3cafb3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicolas Pitre" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 11 18:54:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J29Ir-000412-7P for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:53:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753353AbXLKRxf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:53:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753223AbXLKRxf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:53:35 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.234]:40243 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752510AbXLKRxe (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:53:34 -0500 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1249312nze for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:53:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.215.5 with SMTP id n5mr1996508wfg.1197395610185; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.217.1 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:53:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 12/11/07, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On the gcc repository (which is now a 234 meg pack for me), git > > annotate ChangeLog takes > 800 meg of memory (I stopped it at about > > 1.6 gig, since it started swapping my machine). > > I assume it will run out of memory. I stopped it after 2 minutes. > > And I bet this is the exact same issue as the repack one. > > Do you still have the 2.1GB pack around? I bet annotate would eat much > less memory in that case. I do not, but i could remake it in a few days if it would help