From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce progress updates in background Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:47:33 +0200 Organization: gmx Message-ID: <4c39d8b53964eadeb80f4898c525c42c@www.dscho.org> References: <20150413134850.GC23475@mewburn.net> <20150414031227.GB591600@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "brian m. carlson" , Luke Mewburn , git@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 14 10:47:48 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YhwVW-0004Cl-85 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:47:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752453AbbDNIrm (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:47:42 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:53887 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752323AbbDNIri (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:47:38 -0400 Received: from www.dscho.org ([87.106.4.80]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LxPNC-1ZSVoK44T4-0170rk; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:47:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150414031227.GB591600@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> X-Sender: johannes.schindelin@gmx.de User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.0 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YFdrqxx8hsZOrzK3nIcXaCsHWUByT+ZGjC1dqE7SoM4jJPyakei OmPmyQzwKnv7YzooNP33yJ7b2atIZO5xhB9rKajP3Sw7liDYEeJkMaMYeUTHT4WqcyIY1KL auoj+HtdR0s3DUT8n59MatNpLWkVdhX1FpGZCfH+vcmeRRc+hyKFbkaKYXBV4LvROC0lCuO YiBp00HnGOmwpeSmUx0UA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Brian, On 2015-04-14 05:12, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:48:50PM +1000, Luke Mewburn wrote: > > I appreciated the opportunity to learn about tcgetpgrp(3). The Windows > folks will probably need to stub that function out, but they're no worse > off than they were before. Thanks for thinking of us! Ciao, Dscho