From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" Subject: Re: git-email automatic --to detection? Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:26:18 +0030 Message-ID: <4d8e3fd30802251056t626ff51dx8a6ea7a006222e72@mail.gmail.com> References: <4d8e3fd30802241456l6c02a040te21643c830cf0e46@mail.gmail.com> <20080225183547.GB15131@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "John Goerzen" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Jeff King" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 25 19:57:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTiVX-00021a-M3 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:57:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755375AbYBYS4U (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:56:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754896AbYBYS4U (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:56:20 -0500 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.169]:60332 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754837AbYBYS4T (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:56:19 -0500 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so927617wff.4 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:56:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=EFWz0jaZhiokJ5VMcNMV9pp31/uL/bnsncHmr6y1TIg=; b=gfGRdvaBYgvWwGQWD0xqgAkRzx0Hzr47sq1O2K5aYny/a9YTU3K0mNHjro658BOxTnNPTpjTDstoQK9W87BuhDRaqbX7VYeRtJuDpywsEWE+L7nMWzJLAZ2rhTODXe28TuPT4QCxVUVF5UYLEhGZnMdo4zq3SgmnPYHOA4M17pI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FkQDPdFjkqbYVjAu4iFZqcDyRXI/P1YxiUSi6aLEty+Eljm+0tdjQE4Wd1R3O/RkapHrUcsWS1pRRatJblXvvCVIF7zI++xOA6mgEvHKSA/AdDkWCl0Ol/hNgqTvy+Sgz9/aPwG0LtBhrFU0kGrfwWHeEMz5LJAcuOva4ASNZCE= Received: by 10.142.11.2 with SMTP id 2mr2636216wfk.223.1203965778313; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:56:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.196.10 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:56:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20080225183547.GB15131@sigill.intra.peff.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2/25/08, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:26:03AM +0330, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > > I can't think of how to unify the commands from the ui point of view. > > What do you suggest? > > > > However, i like the idea of a --send commad line option to > > git-format-patch that calls git-send-email to create and send the > > patch series. > > I think it makes sense the other way around: have git-send-email invoke > git-format-patch. > > My reasoning is that git-send-email users almost always use > git-format-patch, but git-format-patch users frequently do not use > git-send-email. that's correct. I even like the idea of a single git email command. ciao, -- Paolo http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/