git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Eric Raible" <raible@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a reference to gitk localbranc remote/branch in gittutorial
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:16:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d8e3fd30808260116o543f1a61sd05070fe02f69d2e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vy72kbov4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
[...]
> With the existing flow, I would actually suggest you not to use
> origin/master at all.  The example before you inserted your changes does
> not update origin/master.
>
>        Alice can use gitk to compare what both of them did:
>
>        $ gitk HEAD FETCH_HEAD
>
> then teach the limiting:
>
>        Notice unlike the earlier example that you used gitk to view the
>        history leading to current status, this shows both histories
>        leading to Alice's current state (HEAD) and the state you just
>        fetched from Bob (FETCH_HEAD).  You can limit what is shown by
>        using revision range notation:
>
>        $ gitk HEAD..FETCH_HEAD
>
>        Two commits written with two dots in between means "show
>        everything that is reachable from the latter but excluding
>        anything that is reachable from the former".  Alice already knows
>        what she did well, as well as what she and Bob started working on,
>        and she is only interested in what Bob did since their histories
>        forked, working independently.
>
>        By the way, the notation "git log -p ..FETCH_HEAD" you saw
>        earlier is a short-hand for "git log -p HEAD..FETCH_HEAD".  HEAD,
>        that means your current state, can be dropped on either side of
>        the two-dot range notation.
>
> It might be better to remove the last paragraph, and instead explain the
> meaning of "..FETCH_HEAD" notation immediately after "git log -p" was used
> to "fetch-review-but-not-integrate" description (i.e. before the part your
> patch touched).
>
> If you want to, you can also teach three-dot form after showing how to use
> the two-dot form.
>
>        Alice may want to view what both of them did since they forked.
>        She can use three-dot form instead of the two-dot form:
>
>        $ gitk HEAD...FETCH_HEAD
>
>        This means "show everything that is reachable from either one, but
>        exclude anything that is reachable from both of them".
>
>        Again, note that these range notation can be used with both gitk
>        and "git log".
>

Maybe something like that?
Not intended to be applied, probably manglade and with no sob.
Just for discussion:

diff --git a/gittutorial.txt.txt b/gittutorial.txt.txt
index 48d1454..4f6d4e9 100644
--- a/gittutorial.txt.txt
+++ b/gittutorial.txt.txt
@@ -321,10 +321,51 @@ pulling, like this:

 ------------------------------------------------
 alice$ git fetch /home/bob/myrepo master
-alice$ git log -p ..FETCH_HEAD
+alice$ git log -p HEAD..FETCH_HEAD
 ------------------------------------------------

 This operation is safe even if Alice has uncommitted local changes.
+Note that HEAD, that means your current state, can be dropped on either
+side of the two-dot range notation.
+This means that Alice can also inspect what Bod did issuing the following
+command:
+
+------------------------------------------------
+alice$ git log -p ..FETCH_HEAD
+------------------------------------------------
+
+Alice can use gitk to compare what both of them did:
+
+------------------------------------------------
+$ gitk HEAD FETCH_HEAD
+------------------------------------------------
+
+This shows both histories leading to Alice's current state (HEAD) and the
+state Alice just fetched from Bob (FETCH_HEAD).
+
+If Alice wants to visualize what Bob did since their historie forked
+she can issue the following command:
+
+------------------------------------------------
+$ gitk HEAD..FETCH_HEAD
+------------------------------------------------
+
+Two commits written with two dots in between means "show
+everything that is reachable from the latter but excluding
+anything that is reachable from the former".
+
+Alice may want to view what both of them did since they forked.
+She can use three-dot form instead of the two-dot form:
+
+------------------------------------------------
+$ gitk HEAD...FETCH_HEAD
+------------------------------------------------
+
+This means "show everything that is reachable from either one, but
+exclude anything that is reachable from both of them".
+
+Please note that these range notation can be used with both gitk
+and "git log".

 After inspecting what Bob did, if there is nothing urgent, Alice may
 decide to continue working without pulling from Bob.  If Bob's history



Ciao,
-- 
Paolo
http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-26  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-25 19:50 [PATCH] Add a reference to gitk localbranc remote/branch in gittutorial Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-25 20:12 ` Eric Raible
2008-08-25 20:33   ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-25 21:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-25 22:12     ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-26  0:29       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-26  8:16         ` Paolo Ciarrocchi [this message]
2008-08-26  8:24           ` Eric Raible
2008-08-26  8:45             ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-26  9:44               ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-26 18:13           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-27  7:58             ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
     [not found]               ` <402731c90808270121t5c09efd1m3b60a1ad15f8f705@mail.gmail.com>
2008-08-27  8:26                 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-27 18:06               ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-28 13:03                 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d8e3fd30808260116o543f1a61sd05070fe02f69d2e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=raible@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).