From: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] bundle-uri: avoid using undefined output of `sscanf()`
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:11:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4dc3e2335afb42e5006ead7b9b18d33bdae7238f.1747314709.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1891.git.1747314709.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
In c429bed102 (bundle-uri: store fetch.bundleCreationToken, 2023-01-31)
code was introduced that assumes that an `sscanf()` call leaves its
output variables unchanged unless the return value indicates success.
However, the POSIX documentation makes no such guarantee:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/sscanf.html
So let's make sure that the output variable `maxCreationToken` is
always well-defined.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
---
bundle-uri.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bundle-uri.c b/bundle-uri.c
index 96d2ba726d99..13a42f92387e 100644
--- a/bundle-uri.c
+++ b/bundle-uri.c
@@ -532,11 +532,13 @@ static int fetch_bundles_by_token(struct repository *r,
*/
if (!repo_config_get_value(r,
"fetch.bundlecreationtoken",
- &creationTokenStr) &&
- sscanf(creationTokenStr, "%"PRIu64, &maxCreationToken) == 1 &&
- bundles.items[0]->creationToken <= maxCreationToken) {
- free(bundles.items);
- return 0;
+ &creationTokenStr)) {
+ if (sscanf(creationTokenStr, "%"PRIu64, &maxCreationToken) != 1)
+ maxCreationToken = 0;
+ if (bundles.items[0]->creationToken <= maxCreationToken) {
+ free(bundles.items);
+ return 0;
+ }
}
/*
--
gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 13:11 [PATCH 00/11] CodeQL-inspired fixes Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] commit: simplify code Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 19:48 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 20:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-15 20:49 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] fetch: carefully clear local variable's address after use Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 19:40 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] commit-graph: avoid malloc'ing a local variable Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 19:54 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 21:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] upload-pack: rename `enum` to reflect the operation Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 19:55 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] has_dir_name(): make code more obvious Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 20:04 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] fetch: avoid unnecessary work when there is no current branch Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 20:11 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] Avoid redundant conditions Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 20:13 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] trace2: avoid "futile conditional" Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 20:16 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] commit-graph: avoid using stale stack addresses Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 20:19 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 13:11 ` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget [this message]
2025-05-15 19:21 ` [PATCH 10/11] bundle-uri: avoid using undefined output of `sscanf()` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-15 20:25 ` Jeff King
2025-05-16 10:11 ` Phillip Wood
2025-05-16 13:40 ` Phillip Wood
2025-05-16 15:42 ` Jeff King
2025-05-19 9:03 ` Phillip Wood
2025-05-22 6:03 ` Jeff King
2025-05-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] sequencer: stop pretending that an assignment is a condition Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-15 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-15 20:26 ` Jeff King
2025-05-16 10:13 ` Phillip Wood
2025-05-15 20:26 ` [PATCH 00/11] CodeQL-inspired fixes Jeff King
2025-05-15 20:58 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4dc3e2335afb42e5006ead7b9b18d33bdae7238f.1747314709.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).