From: pclouds@gmail.com
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Shawn Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] index-pack: a naive attempt to flatten find_unresolved_deltas
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 20:40:38 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ee0be70.44f2320a.3fe8.632b@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323351638-4790-1-git-send-email-y>
From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
This seems to work for me. But I think this approach uses (much?) more
memory because it turns a tree of calls into a flat list of calls and
keep the list until the end, while the recursive version only has to
keep one call chain at a time.
Any ideas how to improve it?
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
---
builtin/index-pack.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c
index 9855ada..d4c182f 100644
--- a/builtin/index-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/index-pack.c
@@ -565,18 +565,31 @@ static void resolve_delta(struct object_entry *delta_obj,
nr_resolved_deltas++;
}
+struct fud_stack {
+ struct base_data base_;
+ struct base_data *base;
+ struct base_data *prev_base;
+};
+
static void find_unresolved_deltas(struct base_data *base,
struct base_data *prev_base)
{
+ struct fud_stack **stack = NULL;
+ int stk, stack_nr = 0, stack_alloc = 0;
int i, ref_first, ref_last, ofs_first, ofs_last;
- /*
- * This is a recursive function. Those brackets should help reducing
- * stack usage by limiting the scope of the delta_base union.
- */
- {
+ ALLOC_GROW(stack, stack_nr + 1, stack_alloc);
+ stack[stack_nr] = xmalloc(sizeof(struct fud_stack));
+ stack[stack_nr]->base = base;
+ stack[stack_nr]->prev_base = prev_base;
+ stack_nr++;
+
+ for (stk = 0; stk < stack_nr; stk++) {
union delta_base base_spec;
+ base = stack[stk]->base;
+ prev_base = stack[stk]->prev_base;
+
hashcpy(base_spec.sha1, base->obj->idx.sha1);
find_delta_children(&base_spec,
&ref_first, &ref_last, OBJ_REF_DELTA);
@@ -588,34 +601,50 @@ static void find_unresolved_deltas(struct base_data *base,
if (ref_last == -1 && ofs_last == -1) {
free(base->data);
- return;
+ free(stack[stk]);
+ stack[stk] = NULL;
+ continue;
}
link_base_data(prev_base, base);
+ ALLOC_GROW(stack, stack_nr +
+ (ref_last - ref_first + 1) +
+ (ofs_last - ofs_first + 1),
+ stack_alloc);
+
for (i = ref_first; i <= ref_last; i++) {
struct object_entry *child = objects + deltas[i].obj_no;
- struct base_data result;
assert(child->real_type == OBJ_REF_DELTA);
- resolve_delta(child, base, &result);
+ stack[stack_nr] = xmalloc(sizeof(struct fud_stack));
+ stack[stack_nr]->base = &stack[stack_nr]->base_;
+ resolve_delta(child, base, stack[stack_nr]->base);
if (i == ref_last && ofs_last == -1)
free_base_data(base);
- find_unresolved_deltas(&result, base);
+ stack[stack_nr]->prev_base = base;
+ stack_nr++;
}
for (i = ofs_first; i <= ofs_last; i++) {
struct object_entry *child = objects + deltas[i].obj_no;
- struct base_data result;
-
assert(child->real_type == OBJ_OFS_DELTA);
- resolve_delta(child, base, &result);
+ stack[stack_nr] = xmalloc(sizeof(struct fud_stack));
+ stack[stack_nr]->base = &stack[stack_nr]->base_;
+ resolve_delta(child, base, stack[stack_nr]->base);
if (i == ofs_last)
free_base_data(base);
- find_unresolved_deltas(&result, base);
+ stack[stack_nr]->prev_base = base;
+ stack_nr++;
}
}
- unlink_base_data(base);
+
+ for (stk = stack_nr - 1; stk >= 0; stk--)
+ if (stack[stk]) {
+ unlink_base_data(stack[stk]->base);
+ free(stack[stk]);
+ }
+ free(stack);
}
static int compare_delta_entry(const void *a, const void *b)
--
1.7.8.36.g69ee2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-08 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-05 7:04 [PATCH] Set hard limit on delta chain depth Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-12-06 12:17 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-12-06 12:32 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-06 12:41 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-12-06 12:48 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-06 14:54 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-12-06 15:30 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-06 18:12 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-12-06 18:56 ` Jeff King
2011-12-06 15:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-06 15:45 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-10 0:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-07 17:50 ` [PATCH] index-pack: eliminate unlimited recursion in get_delta_base() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-12-08 3:02 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-12-08 11:06 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-08 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] index_pack: indent find_unresolved_detals one level pclouds
2011-12-09 21:27 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <1323351638-4790-1-git-send-email-y>
2011-12-08 13:40 ` pclouds [this message]
2011-12-08 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] index-pack: a naive attempt to flatten find_unresolved_deltas Shawn Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ee0be70.44f2320a.3fe8.632b@mx.google.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).