Re: [PATCH 1/3] remote-testsvn.c: Avoid the getline() GNU extension function

[Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>]

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Ramsay Jones
>> <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> The getline() function is a GNU extension (you need to define
>>> _GNU_SOURCE before including stdio.h) and is, therefore, not
>>> portable. In particular, getline() is not available on MinGW.
>>
>> Actually, getline is a POSIX-2008 feature, so it's not (simply) a GNU extension:
>>
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/getline.html
> 
> True, thanks for pointing it out.  Justify the change with something
> like this instead, perhaps?
> 
> 	The getline() function, even though is in POSIX.1-2008, is
> 	not available on some platforms.  Use strbuf_getline() for
> 	portability.
> 
> By the way, the remainder of the proposed log message talks about
> the difference between getline() that keeps the terminating LF vs
> strbuf_getline() that drops it.  Would strbuf_getwholeline() be a
> better alternative?

I don't think it matters; I was just making sure Florian was aware
of the difference (it will not appear in the commit message anyway),
including the memory leak in the original code.

ATB,
Ramsay Jones