From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E02D27A925 for ; Fri, 9 May 2025 12:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.27.42.3 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746792785; cv=none; b=FIc6JR5MYreJaeoFd3jEcysrDjm6XADK0Tr00OJ5+IJbbSyl9VeoVbQXlICHMeiLJfrAUPE5++lgZ2zakXdZBDpQgGAidjL7x2XJkva60V7mvy+pv5En/1IC3S1JPEtc2mzZYLPYSwvjTaxYyqlD+EbzrtVX7dtc5JbJmVUZVKE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746792785; c=relaxed/simple; bh=45tr6tTUAxuU1e73feL3KuixZG1YaAKzKfxLslkFxes=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qZza9IANIBG1sIjbpXSruCPhwvqqR/6/FAKeJFq05/De/V1b48oF9yRMPJ6iHygpfsGUDSMCZrTqXKylNHGaciVeqzYPrFQTd3+gYx/Pfd0jWZ6bh4r6PER0t2SBCc6DXVsveFrr134PpGJqKmiQL7i5nVxhTISKn1UOcH3WBoU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=free.fr; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=free.fr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.b=ccul8Ldn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.27.42.3 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=free.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=free.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.b="ccul8Ldn" Received: from cayenne.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:d1:f360:c2d2:c7d2:a4cd:bda7]) (Authenticated sender: jn.avila@free.fr) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D47013F88F; Fri, 9 May 2025 14:12:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1746792775; bh=45tr6tTUAxuU1e73feL3KuixZG1YaAKzKfxLslkFxes=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ccul8Ldnyh8GKQ0fHcuyrGDzIR7n2N5Z6NtYrF+9RYL2R2bCft5H0kNZDN7zGkypm eVDdNkgG38haOoGMXZJOQ+kT+attCplP+2rHiu/Kapi7klknErLqCaUVCNqQYpvkCR WnrJtcoVODeSHnbY3CzkqlAv5SYabXBFGF4+qvPdRr0IHu9iLkdqdejn8Fg9Inccat REg+nrZdQV2w56lds2uRBEWGSFtzHm2iAVG66mPeKtLgARjtYb2S3AnoC+vpxcyWWN IwNHi9hyuEzE77FgicQGqRWyLgFcRllPoHlzlkUM8pdbQps9ob3W8ASFQkWuPvE5Sk QSTrDzThCMIbg== From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Ob8OrbA==?= AVILA To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Additional changes Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 14:12:53 +0200 Message-ID: <5040970.31r3eYUQgx@cayenne> In-Reply-To: References: <20250503011537.3035416-1-gitster@pobox.com> <20250507210104.26709-2-jn.avila@free.fr> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thursday, 8 May 2025 17:14:40 CEST Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jean-No=C3=ABl Avila writes: > > --- > >=20 > > Documentation/git-daemon.adoc | 60 +++++++++++++++---------------- > > Documentation/git-var.adoc | 40 ++++++++++----------- > > Documentation/git-verify-tag.adoc | 2 +- > > Documentation/git-write-tree.adoc | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) >=20 > I was somewhat confused where this patch is designed to apply, but I > think I figured it out. These are to further update on top of my > synopsis related mark-up updates. >=20 > Do you mean this as a set of review comment, i.e. I am expected to > spilt them into parts and fold them into those three commits to > produce an updated version of those three patches with "Helped-by:" > attributing you? >=20 > Or do you want this to sit on top of the 3-patch series separately > as the 4th patch? If the latter we'd need a log message plus > sign-off. >=20 > I'd assume it is the former (as the three-patch series hasn't hit > 'next' yet) and start updating htese three patches. >=20 > Thanks. Sorry for not being clear. I was wary of what the provided patches did not= =20 address, so I reviewed after applying your series and bundled it in another= =20 patch, which was not signed off on purpose. Of course, the proposed changes can be discussed. If you prefer, I can=20 dispatch them and propose a v3. Thanks, JN