From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: filter-branch IO optimization Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:36:14 +0200 Message-ID: <5077119E.4060702@kdbg.org> References: <7e000a0f-9e4e-4a4d-a8ce-5d017e17939c@zcs> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git list To: Enrico Weigelt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 11 20:36:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TMNcm-0005TL-UA for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:36:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759062Ab2JKSgi (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:36:38 -0400 Received: from bsmtp5.bon.at ([195.3.86.187]:39647 "EHLO lbmfmo03.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758820Ab2JKSgh (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:36:37 -0400 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at (unknown [192.168.181.107]) by lbmfmo03.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id F214CCDFA9 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:36:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76F2130049; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:36:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC3D19F3D5; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:36:14 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120825 Thunderbird/15.0 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 11.10.2012 17:39, schrieb Enrico Weigelt: > The main goal of this filtering is splitting out many modules from a > large upstream repo into their own downstream repos. ... > The next step I have in mind is using --subdirectory-filter, but open > questsions are: > > * does it suffer from the same problems w/ empty username/email like --tree-filter ? I think so. > ** if yes: what can I do about it (have an additional pass for fixing that before > running the --tree-filter ? Use --env-filter. > * can I somehow teach the --subdirectory filter to place the result under some > somedir instead of directly to root ? No, but see the last example in the man page. > * can I use --tree-filter in combination with --subdireectory-filter ? > which one is executed first ? Yes. --subdirectory-filter applies first. -- Hannes