From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] test-lib: avoid full path to store test results Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:02:48 +0100 Message-ID: <509167C8.6090600@kdbg.org> References: <1351570377-894-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20121030044609.GA10873@elie.Belkin> <20121031012730.GY15167@elie.Belkin> <20121031021318.GB15167@elie.Belkin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Jeff King , =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 31 19:03:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TTcdd-00072K-9G for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:03:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933198Ab2JaSDP (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:03:15 -0400 Received: from bsmtp5.bon.at ([195.3.86.187]:30842 "EHLO lbmfmo03.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759485Ab2JaSDM (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:03:12 -0400 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at (unknown [192.168.181.104]) by lbmfmo03.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5370CCE206 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:03:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2FF130052; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:02:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87D419F35E; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:02:48 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121025 Thunderbird/16.0.2 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 31.10.2012 03:28, schrieb Felipe Contreras: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >>> It's all fun and games to write explanations for things, but it's not >>> that easy when you want those explanations to be actually true, and >>> corrent--you have to spend time to make sure of that. >> >> That's why it's useful for the patch submitter to write them, asking >> for help when necessary. >> >> As a bonus, it helps reviewers understand the effect of the patch. >> Bugs averted! > > Yeah, that would be nice. Too bad I don't have that information, and > have _zero_ motivation to go and get it for you. Just to clarify: That information is not just for Jonathan, but for everyone on this list and those who dig the history a year down the road. Contributors who have _zero_ motiviation to find out that information are not welcome here because they cause friction and take away time from many others for _zero_ gain. -- Hannes