From: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Mark Levedahl" <mlevedahl@gmail.com>,
"Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2012, #03; Tue, 13)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 06:54:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A48391.9090207@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121115015608.GB19131@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 15.11.12 02:56, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:50:43PM -0500, Mark Levedahl wrote:
>
>> Cygwin changed the win32api implementation, and the old is not just
>> no longer supported for the current release series, but virtually
>> impossible to even install (several new packages are now installed,
>> the old package is in the "obsolete" category, i.e., not available).
>> The older cygwin 1.5 dll + utilities can be installed afresh, so that
>> is why I set up to switch based upon dll version - the proposed
>> test(s) and configuration would be to have git maintain compatibility
>> with an unsupported Cygwin configuration. I just don't think this is
>> worth the maintenance burden, but of course I am not the maintainer,
>> just expressing my opinion.
>
> OK. I don't have a strong opinion either, as I don't know what's normal
> in the Cygwin world, and that is probably the most important thing to
> follow for the default. I got the impression that "normal" is changing
> to the new way, but Torsten's message made me wonder if were there quite
> yet (if there was some issue with upgrades versus new fresh installs).
>
> But I have no real cygwin knowledge, so I'll bow out and let you guys
> discuss.
>
My understanding:
Either use people cygwin 1.5 or they use cygwin 1.7, and in this case
the installation is updated frequently.
Peff or Junio, please go ahead with the patch.
If it turns out that we want to support cygwin installations like 1.7.7
which could be upgraded, but are not upgraded since they are
"production machines we do not dare to touch" we can still improve
the autodetection.
Thanks for the responses.
/Torsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-13 17:52 What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2012, #03; Tue, 13) Jeff King
2012-11-13 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-13 20:45 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2012-11-13 20:48 ` Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
2012-11-14 1:18 ` Mark Levedahl
2012-11-14 19:02 ` Jeff King
2012-11-14 21:13 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2012-11-15 0:16 ` Jeff King
2012-11-15 0:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-15 1:50 ` Mark Levedahl
2012-11-15 1:56 ` Jeff King
2012-11-15 5:54 ` Torsten Bögershausen [this message]
2012-11-16 18:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-11-17 7:11 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2012-11-15 19:05 ` Ramsay Jones
2012-11-15 19:35 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2012-11-15 23:34 ` Mark Levedahl
2012-11-13 22:57 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A48391.9090207@web.de \
--to=tboegi@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mlevedahl@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).