From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9yc3RlbiBCw7ZnZXJzaGF1c2Vu?= Subject: Re: t5801-remote-helpers.sh fails Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:52:27 +0100 Message-ID: <50A9043B.6070904@web.de> References: <509E5B27.5080808@web.de> <509EA8EE.1030908@web.de> <50A87718.4030806@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VG9yc3RlbiBCw7ZnZXJzaGF1c2Vu?= , Git Mailing List To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 18 16:52:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta7B0-0003A9-9O for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:52:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752278Ab2KRPwb convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:52:31 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:60380 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752091Ab2KRPwa (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:52:30 -0500 Received: from birne.lan ([195.67.191.23]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LmLK6-1T1bhJ476I-00ZloF; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:52:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:ALzGctkypM/e9nCmHTtyA49Ih0Y84ra5UTFlRTAj2Dv bOHEd8+JluRlea12DTmgmMEq4eVIJOnytAUwX8TuF375Q9OwJY F5VJvDrxVHjfE9pTU+ualolQXLw6exXzfxELdrkdNvKLbTGeO5 K766vEq4FwyVSGuXXL0clx3ixV6SGb/k2/fxRViXT3FYbnufAc gJ21hm25loGVJNGoPBDwA== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 18.11.12 09:23, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Torsten B=C3=B6gershausen wrote: >=20 >> I managed to have a working solution for >> "d) add a check for the bash version to the top of the test in t/" >> Please see diff below. >> >> This unbreaks the test suite here. >> Is this a good way forward? >> >> Filipe, does the code line you mention above work for you? >> >> If yes: I can test it here, if you send it as a patch. >=20 > It's already sent: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/209364 >=20 Thanks for working on it, and sorry that you need to remind me: I had the V5 series already on my harddisk, but forgot to test it. It applied on v.1.8.0 with the following results: ok 1 - setup repository ok 2 - cloning from local repo ok 3 - create new commit on remote ok 4 - pulling from local repo ok 5 - pushing to local repo ok 6 - fetch new branch ok 7 - fetch multiple branches ok 8 - push when remote has extra refs ok 9 - push new branch by name not ok 10 - push new branch with old:new refspec # TODO known breakage ok 11 - cloning without refspec ok 12 - pulling without refspecs not ok 13 - pushing without refspecs # TODO known breakage not ok 14 - pulling with straight refspec # TODO known breakage not ok 15 - pushing with straight refspec # TODO known breakage not ok 16 - pulling without marks # TODO known breakage not ok 17 - pushing without marks # TODO known breakage ok 18 - push ref with existing object # still have 6 known breakage(s) /Torsten