From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: feature suggestion: improve rerere Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:24:18 +0100 Message-ID: <51374382.6050101@viscovery.net> References: <20130306101640.GA15375@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 06 14:24:49 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UDEKv-00009W-3Z for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:24:49 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755684Ab3CFNYX convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Mar 2013 08:24:23 -0500 Received: from so.liwest.at ([212.33.55.24]:13719 "EHLO so.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755527Ab3CFNYW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Mar 2013 08:24:22 -0500 Received: from [81.10.228.254] (helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by so.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDEKQ-00010A-RI; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:24:19 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.95] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C281660F; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:24:18 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 In-Reply-To: <20130306101640.GA15375@pengutronix.de> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 3/6/2013 11:16, schrieb Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig: > ++<<<<<<< ours > +ssize_t xread(int fd, void *buf, size_t count) > +{ > + ssize_t ret, done =3D 0; > + > +retry: > + ret =3D read(fd, buf + done, count - done); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + done +=3D ret; > + > + if (ret =3D=3D 0 /* EOF */ || done =3D=3D count) > + return done; > + else > + goto retry; > +} > + > ++||||||| base > ++=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > + #include "common.h" > +=20 > ++>>>>>>> theirs > int main(int argc,char *argv[]) > { > int fd, val, ret, size, wrote, len; >=20 > This is the same conflict as the first one, just with ours and theirs > exchanged. So my suggestion is to make rerere use the resolution > recorded for the first conflict here. >=20 > Sounds sensible? Of course, and rerere already does it. But only when you use git's defa= ult conflict markers rather than diff3 style markers that have this extra ||||| line. -- Hannes