From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: feature suggestion: improve rerere
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:05:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51383C23.2090900@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130306144225.GB15375@pengutronix.de>
Am 3/6/2013 15:42, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:24:18PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> Am 3/6/2013 11:16, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
>>> ++<<<<<<< ours
>>> +ssize_t xread(int fd, void *buf, size_t count)
>>> +{
>>> + ssize_t ret, done = 0;
>>> +
>>> +retry:
>>> + ret = read(fd, buf + done, count - done);
>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + done += ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (ret == 0 /* EOF */ || done == count)
>>> + return done;
>>> + else
>>> + goto retry;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> ++||||||| base
>>> ++=======
>>> + #include "common.h"
>>> +
>>> ++>>>>>>> theirs
>>> int main(int argc,char *argv[])
>>> {
>>> int fd, val, ret, size, wrote, len;
>>>
>>> This is the same conflict as the first one, just with ours and theirs
>>> exchanged. So my suggestion is to make rerere use the resolution
>>> recorded for the first conflict here.
>>>
>>> Sounds sensible?
>>
>> Of course, and rerere already does it. But only when you use git's default
>> conflict markers rather than diff3 style markers that have this extra
>> ||||| line.
> I only did git checkout --conflict=diff3 after the merge conflict
> happend. So I cannot confirm that git already does it.
>
> So here is a reproduction receipe:
>
> git clone git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git
> cd mtd-utils
> git checkout ca39eb1
> wget -O patch1 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45779/raw
> wget -O patch2 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45591/raw
At least patch2 has incorret index information; it does not apply with am
-3. I generated a working version with format-patch after applying it
directly on top of ca39eb1.
> for p in patch1 patch2; do perl -p -i -e 'print "From tralala Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001\n" if $. == 1' $p; done
Do you have rerere enabled at this point?
git config rerere.enabled true
> git am patch1
> git am -3 patch2 # first merge conflict
> perl -n -i -e 's/=======//; print unless /^[<>]{7} /;' flash_otp_write.c # resolve
> git add flash_otp_write.c
> git am --resolved
> git rebase -i ca39eb1 # swap order of the two patches
>
> results in
>
> $ git ls-files -u
> 100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 1 flash_otp_write.c
> 100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 2 flash_otp_write.c
> 100644 31b963e2d6cf0016ca542529886e1ee71a22664e 3 flash_otp_write.c
Same here.
>
> and resolving yields:
>
> $ git ls-files -s flash_otp_write.c
> 100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 0 flash_otp_write.c
OK.
>
> Then
> git rebase --continue
>
> gives the 2nd rebase conflict:
>
> $ git ls-files -u
> 100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 1 flash_otp_write.c
> 100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 2 flash_otp_write.c
> 100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 3 flash_otp_write.c
Same here.
>
> Now knowing from the previous resolution that with base=f360a3e0
> (= origin + patch1) merging
>
> d407ebbf (= origin) and
> 31b963e2 (= origin + patch1 + patch2)
>
> gives 648e0422 (origin + patch2),
> git could know that with base=d407ebbf (origin) merging 648e0422 (origin
> + patch1) and f360a3e0 (origin + patch1) gives 31b963e2 (origin + patch1
> + patch2) again.
For me, it works as expected, i.e., I get the conflict resolved by rerere.
>
> And git doesn't prepare 31b963e2 in flash_otp_write.c for me.
>
> @Johannes, do you have some non-standard setting, or can you reproduce?
Perhaps:
$ git config --global -l | grep rerere
rerere.enabled=true
-- Hannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-07 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-06 10:16 feature suggestion: improve rerere Uwe Kleine-König
2013-03-06 13:24 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-03-06 14:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-03-07 7:05 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51383C23.2090900@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).