From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Cc: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@alum.mit.edu>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What I want rebase to do
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 11:08:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51386732.1020708@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r4jra942.fsf@pctrast.inf.ethz.ch>
Am 3/7/2013 9:48, schrieb Thomas Rast:
> worley@alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley) writes:
> [...snip...]
>
> Isn't that just a very long-winded way of restating what Junio said
> earlier:
>
>>> It was suggested to make it apply the first-parent diff and record
>>> the result, I think. If that were an acceptable approach (I didn't
>>> think about it through myself, though), that would automatically
>>> cover the evil-merge case as well.
>
> You can fake that with something like
>
> git rev-list --first-parent --reverse RANGE_TO_REBASE |
> while read rev; do
> if git rev-parse $rev^2 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> git cherry-pick -n -m1 $rev
> git rev-parse $rev^2 >.git/MERGE_HEAD
> git commit -C$rev
> else
> git cherry-pick $rev
> fi
> done
>
> Only tested very lightly. Dealing with octopii, conflicts and actually
> preserving the commit's attributes is left as an exercise to the
> reader[1].
I proposed this long ago, but by modifying preserve-merges rather than
with a new option (--first-parent):
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/198125
It works very well. I'm using it frequently in the field.
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-07 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 20:58 "git rebase" loses the additional changes in "evil" merges Dale R. Worley
2013-03-04 21:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-04 21:24 ` Thomas Rast
2013-03-04 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-06 18:55 ` What I want rebase to do Dale R. Worley
2013-03-07 8:48 ` Thomas Rast
2013-03-07 10:08 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2013-03-07 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-07 22:06 ` Dale R. Worley
2013-03-05 21:18 ` "git rebase" loses the additional changes in "evil" merges Dale Worley
2013-03-05 21:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-05 23:16 ` Philip Oakley
2013-03-05 23:31 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51386732.1020708@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
--cc=worley@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).