From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Elijah Newren" Subject: Re: git-cvsimport bug with dates Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:29 -0700 Message-ID: <51419b2c0711160612r1a80bd5o686040f945e8d9c3@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0711152059q55ced86gd224310c8c4a1851@mail.gmail.com> <7vr6iq207f.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 16 15:12:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1It1w7-0002ar-6y for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:12:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758895AbXKPOMa (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:12:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758019AbXKPOMa (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:12:30 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]:48504 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752472AbXKPOM3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:12:29 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1006995wah for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:12:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=uLZIoTeP4NRYe4lOGHa5+mHe4NRB5zX5/7R2ajCd9no=; b=mDVMk83nR6ycTlxUrB0sNeNk/SIzTUFkU1J1JxJ+UbmeP4t789E/T7wiTQgDueK6Ni5V9rci4BdygT6I9W/cyBgcfgms2Ri/mJwpQU5kZW9QPOwkVy1C9Jgw6Wj0cPA3G99nRQBobkyxQc/8FtQ4X6btdNr1zy1ti75aiw1kNXM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GtBSaq4cDifQqho+Q5puRSJZkBdH/rJTw2RuFfCwIUmD241ZNyfDAZW9vyXrdxjRHoOmJYJvtiEBLwESF0S3aU8jwJRBgkzLADt99Rkz0Dl+cZltGu8fRsmUK9MORA1OoAf+IqnQxW5rYMZAIJgev2BmiXzo8L/G34+rGa2DbqI= Received: by 10.114.60.19 with SMTP id i19mr422257waa.1195222349343; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:12:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.211.8 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:12:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7vr6iq207f.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Nov 15, 2007 11:06 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > When you use "branch@{date}" notation, you are not asking a > question on the project history, but a question on the local > view from _your_ repository on that project. Interesting; that makes sense from a merge or pull viewpoint, but wouldn't it make more sense to have cvsimport ensure the commits are treated as though they actually existed in master as of the date specified in CVS? Elijah