From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Mike Ralphson <mike.ralphson@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:23:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51419b2c0902110723y75d0c4a4r34cf92cf371313ea@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090211135640.GA19600@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:48:18AM +0000, Mike Ralphson wrote:
>
>> > On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, newren@gmail.com wrote:
>> > fast-export will only list as parents those commits which have already
>> > been traversed (making it appear as if merges have been squashed if not
>> > all parents have been traversed). To avoid this silent squashing of
>> > merge commits, we request commits in topological order.
>>
>> Any comparative timings? We don't need to rename this to 'git
>> reasonably-speedy-export'? 8-)
>
> Hmm.
>
> In git.git:
>
> $ time git fast-export --all --signed-tags=strip >/dev/null
> real 1m6.013s
> user 1m3.840s
> sys 0m2.140s
>
> $ time git fast-export --all --signed-tags=strip --topo-order >/dev/null
> real 0m49.018s
> user 0m47.987s
> sys 0m0.888s
>
> I certainly didn't expect it to be _faster_. More efficient use of the
> delta cache, maybe?
Yeah, I also saw a speed-up, though the difference was less pronounced
-- 19.7 seconds versus 19.5 (that was the average for 5 runs, after
first doing a run that I ignored to make sure I was comparing
hot-cache to hot-cache).
I'm a little surprised why my numbers were so much lower than yours,
though. I don't think of my hard drive and CPU as being all that
quick -- is this a difference in packing, by chance, with your
repository not having recently been repacked?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-11 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-11 6:03 [PATCH] Add new testcase to show that fast-export can squash merge commits newren
2009-02-11 6:03 ` [PATCH] fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order newren
2009-02-11 10:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-11 10:48 ` Mike Ralphson
2009-02-11 10:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-11 13:56 ` Jeff King
2009-02-11 15:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-11 17:37 ` Jeff King
2009-02-11 15:23 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2009-02-11 17:53 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51419b2c0902110723y75d0c4a4r34cf92cf371313ea@mail.gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.ralphson@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).