From: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] http: preserve wwwauth_headers across redirects
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 17:37:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5144a29d-a53f-4446-beff-e1f549345bf9@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqpl28scll.fsf@gitster.g>
On 6/2/26 5:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/http.c b/http.c
>> index ea9b16861b..cac8c9bfc9 100644
>> --- a/http.c
>> +++ b/http.c
>> @@ -2425,7 +2425,21 @@ static int http_request_recoverable(const char *url,
>> if (options->effective_url && options->base_url) {
>> if (update_url_from_redirect(options->base_url,
>> url, options->effective_url)) {
>> + struct strvec wwwauth_headers = STRVEC_INIT;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Preserve wwwauth_headers across the call to
>> + * credential_from_url(): if the effective URL doesn't
>> + * specify its own credentials, a credential helper
>> + * might need the wwwauth[] array from the server's
>> + * redirect response in order to authenticate.
>> + */
>> + strvec_pushv(&wwwauth_headers,
>> + http_auth.wwwauth_headers.v);
>> credential_from_url(&http_auth, options->base_url->buf);
>> + strvec_pushv(&http_auth.wwwauth_headers,
>> + wwwauth_headers.v);
>> + strvec_clear(&wwwauth_headers);
>> url = options->effective_url->buf;
>> }
>> }
>
> As strvec_pushv() makes copies of the strings contained in .v[]
> array, the above will
>
> - make a deep copy of http_auth.wwwauth_headers.v[] and store it away
> in wwwauth_headers.v[];
>
> - let credential_from_url() get rid of
> http_auth.wwwauth_headers.v[] (the original is freed here, but we
> have a deep copy stashed away safely), and perhaps add some of
> its own there; then
>
> - add what we stashed away back to http_auth.wwwauth_headers.v[].
>
> So it does not leak and it does not have use-after-free, either,
> which is good, even though it may be a bit inefficient having to
> copy these strings so many times.
I agree, although in the grand scheme wwwauth_headers is a drop in the
bucket compared to, say, nearly any git object.
I tried to find an easy way to just not clear it in the first place, but
that doesn't really match what credential_clear() is intended to do.
> I briefly wondered if it is unconditionally adding back the original
> wwwauth_headers always the right thing to do, but I think this is
> good. In the context of http_request_recovorable(), the redirect
> has already happened, and the request to the redirect target has
> failed with a 401. The wwwauth_headers currently in http_auth were
> populated from this 401 response from the redirect target. Since we
> are updating http_auth's URL to match this redirect target (in order
> to query the helper for the correct host), the headers we currently
> have are the active challenges for this new URL. Thus, they must be
> preserved and passed to the helper.
This matches my understanding and I think it points to a more
fundamental design issue: wwwauth_headers aren't really credentials at
all, and maybe they shouldn't be in struct credential in the first
place. I wonder if it would make sense to encapsulate it in some other
http-related structure that lives alongside the credentials, presumably
along with the protocol, host, and path.
> A few design questions that came to my mind are:
>
> - Is wwwauth_headers the _only_ thing that needs to be preserved in
> the existing credential in http_auth? Will it stay to be the
> only thing, or will we need to rethink what this patch did in the
> future when we add such a new member to "struct credential"?
>
> - If we need to preserve some other members in "struct credential",
> or if we add such members to the struct in the future, what would
> be the recommended way to extend what this patch does to cover?
>
> If we add new members in the future to store other transient
> response-based authentication state (e.g. Authentication-Info
> headers, or proxy authentication states), they will be wiped by
> credential_from_url() and will need to be preserved the same way,
> no? This observation and thought experiment may hint that the
> manual save-and-restore approach is not robust against future
> extensions of struct credential.
>
> The current approach of manually saving and restoring
> wwwauth_headers in http.c creates a tight coupling between the HTTP
> layer and the internals of struct credential. If new transient
> fields are added in the future, developers must remember to update
> http.c to preserve them, which may be error-prone.
>
> I wonder if it would make the design more robust and future-proof to
> encapsulate this logic in credential.c instead. For example, we
> could introduce a helper function:
>
> void credential_update_url(struct credential *c, const char *url)
>
> that does what the new code added around credential_from_url() by
> this patch does, perhaps?
Yeah, maybe. I'll think about this design some more.
-- Aaron
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 16:11 [PATCH] http: preserve wwwauth_headers across redirects Aaron Plattner
2026-06-03 0:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-03 0:37 ` Aaron Plattner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5144a29d-a53f-4446-beff-e1f549345bf9@nvidia.com \
--to=aplattner@nvidia.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox