From: Marc Branchaud <mbranchaud@xiplink.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Support triangular workflows
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:55:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5147390C.9060907@xiplink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130318142526.GA23075@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 13-03-18 10:25 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>
>> I've put off implementing remote.default corresponding to
>> remote.pushdefault, as Jeff suggested in [1], because it's currently
>> not an itch; apart from the obvious symmetry, I don't know what
>> purpose it serves: why would anyone want to fetch from a remote other
>> than origin by default? Why wouldn't they simply swap that remote's
>> name with "origin"? However, it's a nice thing to have for symmetry,
>> and it should be trivial to implement: any interested person is
>> welcome to pick it up.
>
> Yeah, I agree that it does not have much point, aside from people who
> have an unreasonable aversion to using the word "origin". There was a
> series posted last summer to add remote.default:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/201065
>
> It ended up stalled and never got merged. I think the main impetus was
> that "git clone -o foo" should leave "foo" in remote.default (of course,
> that still leaves unanswered why anyone would really want to use "-o
> foo" in the first place).
I'm the guy who dropped the ball on that series. I still intend to pick it
up (honest!) but I just haven't had the time.
The impetus was originally getting relative submodule paths to work on
detached HEADs [1]. My patch for that doesn't work when someone does "clone
-o", because various parts of git assume there's a remote named "origin".
The discussion led to the idea of using the remote name specified during the
initial clone, and implementing that as a remote.default config value.
As for why "clone -o" exists, it was added in v1.1.0:
commit e6c310fd0d7384973efc6b1d5999a5e8a5b2f3bd
Author: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Thu Dec 22 23:37:24 2005 +0100
git-clone: Support changing the origin branch with -o
Earlier, git-clone stored upstream's master in the branch named 'origin',
possibly overwriting an existing such branch.
Now you can change it by calling git-clone with '-o <other_name>'.
[jc: added ref format check, subdirectory safety, documentation
and usage string.]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It sounds like the original need for the -o option is no longer pertinent.
OTOH, for folks who deal with several remotes it's nice to name them, and
"origin" isn't necessarily a useful or intuitive name.
M.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/200145
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-18 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 13:16 [PATCH 0/4] Support triangular workflows Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] remote.c: simply a bit of code using git_config_string() Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-18 22:14 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-03-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] remote.c: introduce a way to have different remotes for fetch/ push Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-18 14:31 ` Jeff King
2013-03-18 14:56 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-18 14:58 ` Jeff King
2013-03-18 22:17 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-03-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefault Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-18 22:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-03-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] remote.c: introduce branch.<name>.pushremote Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-18 22:23 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-03-18 14:25 ` [PATCH 0/4] Support triangular workflows Jeff King
2013-03-18 14:28 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-18 14:32 ` Jeff King
2013-03-18 15:55 ` Marc Branchaud [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5147390C.9060907@xiplink.com \
--to=mbranchaud@xiplink.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).