From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git ate my home directory :-(
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:06:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5151D589.2000002@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130326145637.GA3822@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Am 26.03.2013 15:56, schrieb Jeff King:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 02:07:44PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>>> Should this important warning be part of the git(1) documentation on
>>> the environment variables (and possibly other places) given the
>>> consequences of this case? It wasn't something
>>> I'd appreciated from a simple reading.
>>
>> BTW: Can't we change git-clean such that it will not delete any files
>> if GIT_DIR is set and GIT_WORK_TREE is "."?s
>
> We could, but that would break the existing behavior for other people
> (and I assume you mean "when GIT_WORK_TREE is not set at all", as I
> would think GIT_WORK_TREE=. is explicit enough).
Is there a valid use case to call git-clean with GIT_DIR set but GIT_WORK_TREE
not (or to ."")?
It will delete "." ;)
> I am sympathetic to your data loss, but I wonder how common a problem it
> is in practice. Git-clean already does a dry-run by default; you have to
> give it `-f`. This is the first such report we've had. This seems more
> akin to "oops, I accidentally ran `rm -rf` in the wrong directory". Yes,
> it's catastrophic, but at some point you have to accept that deleting
> files is what rm (and git-clean) does; you can only put so many safety
> hoops in place.
The data loss was not too bad. I was able to restore anything within 2 hours.
But was kinda shocked that git-clean deletes files outside my git tree.
I'm aware of -d. But in my case it happened within a fully automated script.
I simply thought GIT_DIR=.. git-clean -f -d does the right thing...
> I don't know. It's an uncommon enough case that we could deprecate
> "GIT_WORK_TREE is implicitly `.`" entirely, but I think it would need a
> deprecation period, and a way to get the same behavior (e.g., allowing
> "GIT_WORK_TREE=.").
Yeah, this sounds sane.
Thanks,
//richard
P.s: I've told this story to some friends and co-workers which use git like me very day.
All of them were shocked about the behavior of git-clean and GIT_DIR.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-25 21:38 git ate my home directory :-( Richard Weinberger
2013-03-25 21:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-25 22:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-25 22:08 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-25 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-25 22:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-25 22:09 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-03-25 22:15 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-25 22:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-25 22:27 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-03-25 22:13 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-25 22:21 ` Brandon Casey
2013-03-26 8:02 ` Philip Oakley
2013-03-26 9:48 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-03-26 15:04 ` Jeff King
2013-03-26 16:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-27 13:05 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-03-26 21:47 ` Philip Oakley
2013-03-26 13:07 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-03-26 14:56 ` Jeff King
2013-03-26 17:06 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2013-03-26 17:20 ` demerphq
2013-03-26 17:48 ` Jeff King
2013-03-26 19:08 ` demerphq
2013-03-26 17:41 ` Jeff King
2013-03-26 18:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-26 20:08 ` Jeff King
2013-03-26 20:11 ` [DONOTAPPLY PATCH 1/3] environment: set GIT_WORK_TREE when we figure out work tree Jeff King
2013-03-26 20:16 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-26 20:12 ` [DONOTAPPLY PATCH 2/3] setup: warn about implicit worktree with $GIT_DIR Jeff King
2013-03-26 20:21 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-26 20:27 ` Jeff King
2013-03-26 20:35 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-27 8:24 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-03-26 20:13 ` [DONOTAPPLY PATCH 3/3] setup: treat GIT_DIR without GIT_WORK_TREE as a bare repo Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5151D589.2000002@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).