From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: Composing git repositories Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:56:19 +0200 Message-ID: <515B37E3.6030706@web.de> References: <7vmwtqt8rs.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vvc8comj5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <51537A7B.7050206@web.de> <5154AACC.7050006@web.de> <20130331225747.GB11704@elie.Belkin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Junio C Hamano , Git List To: Ramkumar Ramachandra X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 02 21:58:03 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UN7LF-0001J6-44 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:58:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933111Ab3DBT5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:57:32 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:61063 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932700Ab3DBT5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:57:32 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.41] ([91.3.136.234]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0M73o5-1UbK9W1KZJ-00wUIj; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:56:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Eq5Qy4/wP/oTxaH7N3kp7XZ8LLjiRHiuJxZk4kYw+Nm +nZDWlRg5P5aYvVmgY3xHl+QwLIQZPsmxo6o02LgPHUCrq7T5U /wEVGMb3J8mIeVCTHvUj6bOWrx6qYukAWU028HOFndU+3d3yoy 8TuFU4G9Df52CX5leuqzKI5jPoc7/7VNbF85g/HxVlmLhclcs6 eKl9WFnsscrZjq4iSicrg== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 02.04.2013 19:44, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra: > Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Elated is probably not the right word. More "annoyed at being told >> their work is ugly without an accompanying concrete and actionable bug >> report". :) > > If I had an actionable report, I'd have started hammering patches > instead of wasting everyone's time here. I'm was presenting fragments > of my thoughts, hoping that it turn into concrete actionable work > after exchanging a few emails. I'm also annoyed that it didn't > happen. But didn't we already note three worthwhile patches (get rid of the top-level requirement and relocate a .git directory at "add" time and anytime later)?