From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: Composing git repositories Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:59:44 +0200 Message-ID: <515B38B0.2040705@web.de> References: <7vmwtqt8rs.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vvc8comj5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <51537A7B.7050206@web.de> <5154AACC.7050006@web.de> <51597A37.1010301@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Phil Hord , Junio C Hamano , Git List To: Ramkumar Ramachandra X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 02 22:05:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UN7SJ-00064E-4I for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 22:05:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932697Ab3DBUEv (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:04:51 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:55548 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932549Ab3DBUEu (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:04:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.41] ([91.3.136.234]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LvSQV-1UmrkQ02SJ-00zxPz; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:59:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:3A+cas5ltQgOOcqI4g+3h/WfjxygvQsyn9BW8ttjvRb cHIm5gYCF6KqBPRo84eU0JqcAw2d9FV0/NIESF3ILNNY5iVQfT +n64SHVg1AWoqx1VtGcjIgMr/O8x47dYjqpPGCx+PvpuydgYNU G0mR6DtbPwq/8qbYJCanhqCqN+oXyCX9us0XE0NVZu3cldu68S LDarjKVT6/+A35LpCXMzg== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 02.04.2013 20:35, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra: > Jens Lehmann wrote: >> But I think we recently learned to support that use case with >> submodules. I think there are two floating models: >> >> - Tracked: >> [...] >> >> - Untracked: >> Some people just want "the newest" tip of a branch checked out in >> the submodule and update that from time to time (I suspect this >> is because they are used to SVN externals, which I believe work >> that way). You throw away reproducibility, which I think is not >> good and not the way I expect Git to work. >> [...] > > Nope, it has nothing to do with SVN externals; I've never used them. > And no, all repositories aren't created equal. I should be able to > add in magit.git into my dotfiles repository without worrying about > which commits the other repositories were at a particular commit. If > my project depends on the bleeding edge of poppler and girarra, I > should always be able to tell what commits in each subproject the > build was passing in. In other words, I should be able to freely > mixed floating and fixed submodules. There's no reason for one to be > Right, and the other to be a shunned second-class citizen. But you can currently mix floating and fixed submodules, as each submodule can be configured differently. Or am I missing something here?